k more than 12 min when the file is
already present at destination(target).
I am not going to give up I am going to try again and see...
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a4429359
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble
lsk wrote:
>Hello Shachar...is 2.6.7 is the latest version of rsync. I could see
>in the http download site it says "rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz". Should I get this
>version 2.6.8 + the patch "dynamic_hash.diff".
>
>
Yes. In the over a month that passed since the
c-2.6.8.tar.gz". Should I get this
version 2.6.8 + the patch "dynamic_hash.diff".
Also I am planning to install in only the sending machine...and first try
out.
Thanks for your feedback.
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:54:22AM -0800, lsk wrote:
> rsync: write failed on "/db31/oradata/sids/w1.dbf": File too large (27)
This error is coming from your OS. Either the libraries you linked
rsync with do not handle large files, or the destination filesystem
does not suppo
Wayne,
The rsync currently running has transferred few files for eg:6gb,8gb and one
24gb files from that batch file but failed on others big files
constantly..these are only few of the big files that it was able to
transfer. Is it in any contention since all the 5 rsync streams are trying
to tran
is not the problem, you'll need to figure out why the 2.6.6
build didn't get compiled with large-file support for the functions
that it uses: mkstemp() (or mktemp() if your OS didn't have a good
enough mkstemp() function), open(), and lseek() all need to be O.K.
/// lsk
How
This is the exact error msg from the logany patches or fix for this..
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (30 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(434)
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 2897 bytes: phase "unknown"
[sender
I started the massive transfer based on the historical timings, but now I am
facing lots of problems in the transfer...I am getting lot of errors like
this..
This is a very critical production update I have only 3 weeks time to
complete this 4 tb transfer that was taken from historical times usin
several network round trips per file.
--
Matt McCutchen
// lsk-> I would like to do rsync from a disk level by using
--files-from=FILE option. But the problem is what will happen if the network
connection fails the whole rsync will fail right. One advantage that I have
if do rsync file
Also I use the rsync version "rsync version 2.6.5 protocol version 29" does
this version include this patch "dynamic_hash.diff"" or do we need to
install it seperately.
At destination server I use "rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29"
anyhow u sai
lsk wrote:
>But I have tried various options including --inplace,--no-whole-file etc.,
>for last few weeks but all the results show me removing the destination
>server oracle datafiles and after that doing an "rsync -vz" from source is
>faster than copying(rsyncing) over
ind
moved data), and copying the 4TB to temp. files every time could become
a big timewaster. Also the -t option could be handy, not all files
change all the time IIRC.
***lsk
I can't use -t because the oracle datafiles header information are constanly
updated so it will definetely
Also rsync gurus would you suggest which is the fastest way to trasfer this
4 TB data ? Any suggestions...would be of great help.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a3516542
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
-
I bet --inplace will cut the
time another 20-40% or so.
--
Matt McCutchen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hashproduct.metaesthetics.net/
lsk --> Matt I was doing lot of tests with the real time TTS
ransfers using rsync of oracle datafiles. Out of that what I observed was,
with the fil
en create a database using control file so I am desperate of trying
all options that would suffice my need to get this done in less amount of
time.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3215145
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at
options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
/// lsk-> Linus in my case the destination server path name and source
path name that includes SID is different so how you would build the rsync
syntax using --fi
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
> I have been using the following syntax..
>
> rsync -cvz /d01/app/testfile1.dbf tarser:/t01/app/testfile1.dbf
>
> but I would change to the one below and test a 40 GB transfer and see the
> results...
>
> rsync -zv --no
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
> I have been using the following syntax..
>
> rsync -cvz /d01/app/testfile1.dbf tarser:/t01/app/testfile1.dbf
>
> but I would change to the one below and test a 40 GB transfer and see the
> results...
>
> rsync -zv --no
alling it for each
> file will wait for several network round trips per file.
Thanks Matt. I thought that might be the case.
--
//*** lsk => Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option "--files-rom=FILE".
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
h
Wayne Davison-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:58:26AM -0800, lsk wrote:
>> 2) And Matt could explain little more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
>
> What he meant is that, without --inplace, rsync creates an updated file
> and moves it into place, maki
more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
3) We need to RSYNC a 5 TB worth of datafiles and the create a target
database by replicating the source so I need the best option to RSYNC only
the changes instead of the whole 5 TB database.
Thanks,
lsk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
Thanks Matt since morning I am running some real time tests with 7 GB
datafile as you had suggested I should post back the results as soon as that
finishes...and we could find out whether rsync algorithm works as it should.
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help
Gian,
"What do you mean by "cleanup the datafiles on the target server"? Are
you editing files on the target server? "
lsk: That means I delete/rm the files from the target and then start rsync.
"If the target is not 100% different from the source, yes, keep it!
cleaning the old files so in the
old files only the changes will be copied and new files also needs to be
rsynced.
What is the rsync command to be used ?
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3075671
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum
24 matches
Mail list logo
