Den 2016-01-26 kl. 09:06, skrev Simon Hobson:
>>> >>The other option is
>>> >>
>>> >>HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS
>> >
>> >If you use a network connection then you've still got that network
layer.
> Just thinking a bit more about that ...
>
> Is your normal setup
I scrapped all my previous progress and started over with a different
"connection setup", now the NAS is connected to the computer using 1
Gbit wired ethernet, while the source disk is still using FW800.
On bigger files I now typically get 20-30 MB/s so that was a substantial
improvement. It s
On 2016-01-25 01:13, Selva Nair wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:48 PM,
mailto:dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com>> wrote:
That doesn't make sense. Both the source and destination path
contains simple alphanumeric characters, no more no less. Why would
it matter whether the
Thank you. I will try your suggestions. First I will connect the NAS
directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or
should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then it would look like this:
Computer <--FW800--> HD <--USB2--> NAS
The other option is
HD <--FW800--> Computer
On 2016-01-24 20:39, Selva Nair wrote:
Sorry for butting in, but hope this helps:
The command line you posted earlier reads
% rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f %b"
/source/ /destination/
I think Kevin is asking you write out that /source/ and /destination
exactly a
On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote:
Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere
else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your
actual command line and an ls -li of the correct source and incorrect
target?
Are you trolling me? All the information
On 2016-01-23 23:24, Kevin Korb wrote:
I need to know what the paths were so I know how they relate to the
file names you listed.
I posted the relevant parts of the path in a previous message
/Volumes/A/Backups.backupdb/mm/2011-06-23-040258/path/DSCF0748.JPG
/Volumes/B/Backups.backupdb/mm/2011
On 2016-01-23 22:59, Kevin Korb wrote:
> I want to know what your whole command line was so I can understand
> your results.
% rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f %b"
/source/ /destination/
(and after the interruption I removed z)
--
Please use reply-all for most replies
On 2016-01-23 22:02, Kevin Korb wrote:
What was your rsync source and target that made those?
What do you mean? Filesystem is HFS (Mac OS X). Rsync version is 3.1.2
from MacPorts. Source is a regular directory/folder on an external HD,
destination is a disk image.
--
Please use reply-all fo
On 2016-01-23 21:16, Kevin Korb wrote:
> As long as it still sees both links it is fine.
>
> Essentially, the way it works is that whenever rsync -H (on the
> source) sees a file with a link count >1 it remembers the
> inode#>filename pair. If it finds another instance of that inode it
> then lin
On 2016-01-23 17:50, Kevin Korb wrote:
It will, assuming it sees both links in the same rsync run.
How does one handle interrupted transfers if one wants to preserve hard
links? Would --partial and --append-verify work?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing l
On 2016-01-21 09:20, dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com wrote:
I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million files/approximately 1.8
TB data (a Mac OS X Time Machine backup) over a 100 MBit connection.
I use rsync 3.1.1 from MacPorts (I first tried the built in rsync,
version 2.6.9,
On 2016-01-21 15:00, Kevin Korb wrote:
> First, don't use -z on a local copy. It will only make rsync slower
> for no reason at all.
Thanks. Hadn't thought about that. I just copied most from the spelled
out "archive" list of switches. But is rsync so "stupid" that it really
considers z for a
I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million files/approximately 1.8
TB data (a Mac OS X Time Machine backup) over a 100 MBit connection.
I use rsync 3.1.1 from MacPorts (I first tried the built in rsync,
version 2.6.9, since it has a Mac OS X specific cache parameter, but it
ran out of mem
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a limitation that can be worked around with a
setting somewhere, but I have found a problem with cygwin 1.7 while using
rsync. I have been using rsync and cygwin v1.5 for quite some time. I
recently started testing cygwin v1.7 and I ran into a problem with an a
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a limitation that can be worked around with a
setting somewhere, but I have found a problem with cygwin 1.7 while using
rsync. I have been using rsync and cygwin v1.5 for quite some time. I
recently started testing cygwin v1.7 and I ran into a problem with an a
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a limitation that can be worked around with a
setting somewhere, but I have found a problem with cygwin 1.7 while using
rsync. I have been using rsync and cygwin v1.5 for quite some time. I
recently started testing cygwin v1.7 and I ran into a problem with an a
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a limitation that can be worked around with a
setting somewhere, but I have found a problem with cygwin 1.7 while using
rsync. I have been using rsync and cygwin v1.5 for quite some time. I
recently started testing cygwin v1.7 and I ran into a problem with an a
< The receiving rsync first creates a temporary file in the destination
directory with a name in the format ".foo.XX", where "foo"
< represents the name of the source file. Only when rsync is interrupted does
it convert the temporary file to a partial file named exactly "foo"
< and placed in
I am using the command options listed below. If I set --partial or
--partial-dir, I see the partial file appear as expected. However, even with
--partial-dir set as you see below, the .rsync-partial directory is never
created. Instead the partial file just appears in the directory. The bigge
On Mon 18 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> The way I solved this problem for a data-mirroring system was to use a
> >> small wrapper script that ensures only one invocation of rsync is ever
> >> running at one time. This proved to be a robust solution for our situation.
>
> >> --Kyle
>
> A different Kyle wrote:
> I have a situation that requires the files that rsync is
> uploading/downloading to be locked. The reason is because it is possible
> to have more than one copy of rsync running and without file locking,
> the additional copies simply retry to upload/download a file tha
First let me say that rsync is a wonderful program and thank you all for the
hard work that went into it's creation. On to my question. I have a situation
that requires the files that rsync is uploading/downloading to be locked. The
reason is because it is possible to have more than one copy
27;
at the beginning. But why does this only occur at random, not for every
file? Note the 'false alarms' above - does that mean
anything?
Does anyone have any further notion why I get these
rename errors?
Thanks in Advance!
Corey.
- Original Message -
From:
Co
Hi
All,
I've seen several
variations on this topic, but nothing exactly the same:
I have two Windows
2003 servers that I want to use rsync (2.6.8) to mirror. These machines
are separated by a WAN.
Initial attempts to
get rsync working between them have not been successful. The firs
Here are answers to all you questions, I hope.
The platforms are:
1)administration desktop (pc here)
Mandriva LE2005
2)servera
Debian 3.0
3)serverb
Fedora Core 3
ssh from servera to serverb (in a remote ssh shell from "pc
here") is working
ssh from serverb to severa (in a remote ssh shell fr
los - ethical services (external
mailing lists) wrote:
> > What I do is to go to one of the server (server a) as
> > root using ssh, navigate to the directory, and write
> >
> > rsync -avz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:directory/ ./
> >
> > This is the error we get
>
The fact is, we can login as username on this server.
Instead of giving an error should then ask me for password,
I think.
Corrado
On Monday 10 Oct 2005 17:44, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Mon 10 Oct 2005, symbulos - ethical services (external
mailing lists) wrote:
> > What I do is to
I apologise for the incongruous posting.
We have two webservers, a and b, both of them with rsync
installed.
We would like to rsync one directory on one server with
another directory on another server.
What I do is to go to one of the server (server a) as root
using ssh, navigate to the direc
Dear friends,
a newbie here.
we have two webservers, a and b, both of them with rsync
installed.
We would like to rsync one directory on one server with
another directpory on another server.
What I do is to go to one of the server (server a) as root
using ssh, navigate to the directory, and
I read the following hint at:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental
mv backup.0 backup.1
rsync -a --delete --link-dest=../backup.1 source_directory/ backup.0/
I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could
always go back to a certain date. I would
I'm running an linux server and needing to back it up each day to a Mac OS X Server. The sync works fine, however a dated backup is not working for some reason. I'm trying to use the following to create those backups, could someone please point out why this is not working or why it there is a Mac
Yeah, that does not work because it only seems to operate on an entire
directory not an individual file..
- Greg
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bill Bumgarner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:31:24 AM US/Eastern
To: "George D.Plymale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fink rsync --daemon failure
On Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003, at 08:14 US/Eastern, George D.Plymale wrote:
It would seem that OS X
Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 07:37 AM, jw schultz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:50:59AM -0500, lists wrote:
The first two lines are the daemon stopping/starting:
Feb 19 06:48:11 x rsyncd[25661]: rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or
SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(280)
Feb 19 06:48:18 x rsyncd[2951
: Invalid argument
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 06:39 AM, jw schultz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:28:58AM -0500, lists wrote:
I am trying to set up a MacOS X rsync server and am not having much
success at the moment. I'm able to see the "share" alright, but here
is wh
I am trying to set up a MacOS X rsync server and am not having much
success at the moment. I'm able to see the "share" alright, but here
is what I get when I actually try to copy anything to the server:
#rsync -vz /Users/myhome localhost::backup
@ERROR: setgroups failed
rsync: connection unexpe
3 100%0.00kB/s0:00:00
wrote 30496 bytes read 327051 bytes 14593.76 bytes/sec
total size is 419896352 speedup is 1174.38
Write failed flushing stdout buffer.
write stdout: Broken pipe
time /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzP host: /bkup-zone --delete
this is the command which is bein
38 matches
Mail list logo
