Re: --filter, missing in action.

Il giorno gio, 23/04/2009 alle 18.01 +0300, Teodor MICU ha scritto: > Until now I've done this by adding "- foo/" on the exclude file. With this > line rsync will not touch any "foo/" directory on the receiver. > > I don't see yet the advantage of using "--filter" over "--exclude" but I > hope som

Re: --filter, missing in action.

Il giorno gio, 23/04/2009 alle 17.32 +0200, Paul Slootman ha scritto: > On Thu 23 Apr 2009, Teodor MICU wrote: > > > Until now I've done this by adding "- foo/" on the exclude file. With this > > line rsync will not touch any "foo/" directory on the receiver. > > --delete-excluded will screw this

--filter, missing in action.

is : - .cache - .gvfs - .gconf - .gconfd - .mozilla/**/Cache - .mozilla/firefox/*/lock - .mozilla/firefox/*/.parentlock - Desktop/Exclude - media Where I get it wrong? Thanks folks for reading this long post! Fred -- istrice -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the