I am using rsync in the following manner
rsync -av --inplace --update --log-file=/medhd/a3-swbase/05-nonfsw.log
/medhc/a3-swbase/05-nonfsw /medhd/a3-swbase/
Normally the file name is outputted. Would it be possible to also add the time
before the name?--
Please use reply-all for most replies t
ce
> > > > > arguments. Instead of the source simply being . it can be a list of
> > > > > stuff. Also, note that -a includes --recursive except when
> > > > > --files-from
> > > > > is in play.
> > > >
> > > > I am tr
t; >
> > I am trying send via rsync a shuffled list of files.
> >
> > > On 9/17/21 7:11 PM, hancooper via rsync wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am trying to pass filename results that have been shuffled, then pass
> > > > the file to rsync.
> > &g
rsync can have multiple source
> arguments. Instead of the source simply being . it can be a list of
> stuff. Also, note that -a includes --recursive except when --files-from
> is in play.
I am trying send via rsync a shuffled list of files.
> On 9/17/21 7:11 PM, hancooper via rsync wro
I am trying to pass filename results that have been shuffled, then pass the
file to rsync.
Not quite sure whether to use --files-from=- or some other way.
shuf -n "$nf" -e ${dpath}/${incl} |
rsync -av --update --files-from=- . "$dst"--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the
Occasionally rsync issues errors, which result in slowing a system during a
transfer.
Would it be possible to skip the transfer of the file rather than having rsync
continue to insist, trying the transfer many times?
rsync: read errors mapping
"/media/hagbard/hc1/d5-comms/c-periodc/a-exposn/new
e:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Sunday, September 12, 2021 2:34 AM, hancooper via rsync
> > rsync@lists.samba.org wrote:
> >
> > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > > On Sunday, September 12, 2021 2:03 AM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, September 12, 2021 2:34 AM, hancooper via rsync
wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, September 12, 2021 2:03 AM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.net wrote:
>
> > I thought I did elaborate. If it is a problem for you
refore it will be
> > > newer than the source file and unless the source is updated rsync
> > > --update will never complete the file.
> >
> > Is there a solution to this problem and should we consider it a bug?
> > I am encountering this, and it's a real prob
x27;s a real problem for me if files are
not completed.
> On 9/11/21 6:50 PM, hancooper via rsync wrote:
>
> > I am struggling to understand exactly what the rsync options --update and
> > --append-verify do.
> > Doing info rsync gives
> > -u, --update
> > This f
I am struggling to understand exactly what the rsync options --update and
--append-verify do.
Doing info rsync gives
-u, --update
This forces rsync to skip any files which exist on the destina‐
tion and have a modified time that is newer than the source
file. (If
multiple CPUs on the
> > > single host. You would need to do some experimentation to determine the
> > > best number for your hardware and network. Also, if you exceed that
> > > number you can put more stress on the backup machine lessening the
> > > impact to the ho
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:12 PM, hancooper via rsync
wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 8:25 PM, Kevin Korb via rsync
> rsync@lists.samba.org wrote:
>
> > In my experience backing up multiple hosts to
o do some experimentation to determine the
> best number for your hardware and network. Also, if you exceed that
> number you can put more stress on the backup machine lessening the
> impact to the hosts being backed up.
>
> On 8/24/21 3:58 PM, hancooper via rsync wrote:
>
> > It makes
It makes sense to we to run multiple rsync commands to speed up a backup.
At work, some have argued that if I sync the data all to the same host, there
is no advantage
in parallelization. Whether you sync 3x 1G in parallel or 1x 3G makes no
noticeable difference.
Speed in general does not incre
15 matches
Mail list logo
