Does this mean that rsync requires that the destination directory be owned by
the user calling rsync and that it is not sufficient for the user to have write
permissions to that directory?
> The only way you can have inconsistent ownership (without having root
> involved) is for you to have ommi
We were successfully using rsync (via rsh) between two boxes where the command
was run by the user that owned the destination directory. We had to change our
destination directory to one that user does not own, but is within the same
group as the owner and the directory is set with group write a
