> I don't believe the transferring part of rsync will jump around.
How about the deleting part?
> It will transfer files it deems need it in the order it finds them
> which will be 1 dir at a time. Though when it enters a child dir that
> doesn't mean it is done with the parent dir.
In the sen
Thanks for your message again. I appreciate your answers.
I don't mind about the order of the files, and neither really about the
order of the directories: I'm interested about whether rsync might
transfer some files into a directory, then transfer some files into
another which is outside of the f
Thanks Kevin,
but I don't understand your message, or at least how it answers my "real
question" (last paragraph)... and by the way --delete defaults to
--delete-during for current versions of rsync as far as I know...
> rsync doesn't really give much control over the order it does things
> in. I
Also note the SORTED TRANSFER ORDER paragraph in the rsync
manual. I don't think this paragraph is relevant to my question because
I understand it's only relevant to multiple nonrecursive rsync commands;
whereas I have one single recursive rsync command.
--
Please use reply-all for most r
The only explanation I can find for such behaviour is that
incremental recursion is being used, which leads me to deduce that the
lines with path outside of the directory "A/B/...", can only indicate
folder creation. But yet I cannot buy this explanation because why would
such "atypical fol
Dear rsync community,
I hope that someone can help me with this issue, probably
related to my lack of understanding of how rsync recursive works. In the
output was displayed something like this (I don't remember in the lines
below whether rsync was deleting or creating files or bot
