Re: preserving Mac OS X metadata in rsync backups and restores

2008-01-19 Thread Victor Shoup
d BSD flags other than uchg, uappnd (I modified the backup-bouncer test suite to restrict to just these BSD flags, to verify). -- Victor Shoup On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:12 PM, Moritz Heckscher wrote: Am 2008-01-19 um 01:37 schrieb Moritz Heckscher: 3) To help with the checking/comparing, so

Re: lchmod for osx (was: Symlinks in OS X (10.4.1))

2007-10-16 Thread Victor Shoup
I've noticed the same thing...trying to change any of the timestamps on a symlink via setattrlist does nothing at all (not even complain). On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: Here's a patch that makes link permissions work when applied to rsync CVS. I am also trying to mak

Re: PATCH: preserve osx creation-date (was: Using pre2 for backing up a mac)

2007-10-15 Thread Victor Shoup
ould be much better if it were in the main rsync source. -- Victor Shoup On Oct 15, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: On Oct 15, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 08:14:57PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: I've attached a patch which does this.

macintosh metadata madness

2007-06-04 Thread Victor Shoup
e OSX metadata, and in particular, to backup (and restore) this metadata to a non-OSX, unix machine (using rsync, of course). If you're interested, go to http://www.shoup.net and follow the link to "Macintosh Metadata Madness". Cheers, Victor Shoup -- To unsubscribe or c

compiling rsync on OSX

2007-04-12 Thread Victor Shoup
Are there any known issues compiling the latest rsync on OSX (10.4)? I've noticed some references to one or two patches, but I'm not sure what they are. I compiled v2.6.8 some time back on a powerpc, with no patches, and it seemed to work OK. I saw nothing in the INSTALL file that suggests

xattrs questions

2007-04-07 Thread Victor Shoup
I see that rsync will eventually support extended attributes, which will be great. But: will it allow backup from a file system that supports xattrs, to one that does not? For this to work, rsync would have to represent the xattrs on the destination machine in some special format, I suppose,

rsync on osx hack

2007-03-28 Thread Victor Shoup
sting. Any feedback is appreciated. -- Victor Shoup -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Xattr on FreeBSD ... Good Luck ?

2006-11-02 Thread Victor Shoup
There is a third way: Simply keep all the files you want backed up in a UFS formatted partition on the mac. This way, all the metadata for file foo is in the file ._foo, and rsync backs these up perfectly, and all the data and metadata can also be accessed vi NFS. Restoring is a bit of a p

Re: Extended attributes in MacOS X

2006-10-26 Thread Victor Shoup
I'm glad to see rsync may finally be getting proper support for extended attributes on OSX (since apple's own implementation of this is notoriously buggy). I'm wondering, though: does the xattr code avoid copying, or even comparing hashes of, the xattr data itself? Especially on OSX there ca

rsync, mac OSX tiger, and UFS

2006-09-05 Thread Victor Shoup
Hi, I'd like to make a "feature request" for users of rsync on Mac OSX Tiger (10.4) Given the current sorry state of backup tools on Mac OSX, the only way I've found to reliably backup data from Mac OSX is to keep the data on a UFS volume, and to then backup it up using *standard* rsync (no -

rsync and symbolic links

2006-06-29 Thread Victor Shoup
Is this a known issue? rsync does not always preserve dates and permissions on symbolic links, and while the -i option indicates it is trying to bring things in sync, it does not. Maybe between OS's that have sufficiently different implementations, this is not possible. -- To unsubscribe or ch

not all files copied

2006-06-24 Thread Victor Shoup
Hi, I'm using rsync to copy and sync a directory of about 25,000 files across two machines. I used rsync to make an initial copy, from machine 1 to machine 2, and then syncing back incremental changes from machine 2 to machine 1. On the initial copy from machione 1 to machine 2, I found that a