On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:42:15PM -0400, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Yes - rsync should _not_ use known-bad copies of files unless --partial has
> been specified.
I'd have to agree with Carson 100%. Of the files that appear on the
destination, I'd expect them all to be 100% accurate or fail to get
c
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:39:24PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> It's pretty easy to at least fix this file-is-up-to-date deception.
While this fix may be useful to some people, I'd much rather wait to
see a real fix such that read errors on the sending side doesn't result
in a corrupt file on the
I've run into a bug in the IO handling when reading a file. Suppose I
have a file that lives on an NFS filesystem. That filesystem is NOT
being exported with auth=0 permissions. So, if I try to access a file
as root, it successfully opens the file, but subsequent reads fail with
EACCES. This pr