On Jan 14, 2025, at 16:34, rsync.project wrote:sorry about the prefix changes in rsync-patches.No problem; those changes were easy to remove from the fileflags patch. We're going to be dropping the whole rsync-patches system soon anyway, as it really isn't working well. It was supposed to be a stag
The patches within the rsync-patches-3.4.0.tar.gz archive seem to contain new
unnecessary hunks that change the prefix from /usr to /usr/local. This was not
the case in 3.3.0.
I use the fileflags.diff patch in the MacPorts build of rsync, and with the
3.4.0 version of this patch, it does not b
ating it into rsync directly?
-Ryan
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
From: Paul Slootman [paul+rs...@wurtel.net]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:40 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Cc: Ryan John
Subject: Re: rsync without POSIX ACLs
On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
>>
>> The umask would be preferable to u
John
From: ericbamba...@discover.com [ericbamba...@discover.com]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:26 AM
To: Ryan John
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org; rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync without POSIX ACLs
Ryan,
I'm not sure what you expect to happen
Hi,
I’m trying to rsync from an IBM SONAS, that has no POSIX ACLs.
I thought that without the –p flag, this should still work, and the destination
will just inherit permissions, however, it doesn’t.
My source directory on the SONAS looks like:
~$ ls -la /net/sonas/directory
d- 2 user grou
the destination, which is what it
should check. I wrote a hack to check if fd corresponds to a device instead
(simple code changes below), which seemed to make things work although it
should be coded more cleanly. Thanks.
Ryan
Informal description of changes from receiver.c line 369:
On May 5, 2010, at 10:41 PM, Michael Renner wrote:
> I'm writing a compley backup application with rsync in shell.
>
> What I do to report errors: analyze the return code an internal table with
> error specifications and reporting these in clear text. The code:
You mean you just look at the r
Hello again,
Is there a reliable way I can parse the errors or get a direct list that rsync
produces while transferring? I'm writing a GUI and the only way to get errors
has been using regular expressions (all lines starting with "rsync:" for one)
but it's not always reliable because I don't kn
On May 1, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:21 +0700, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> Rsync determines which of the files in the file list need a data
>>> transfer as it goes, so the o
On May 1, 2010, at 6:58 AM, Robert DuToit wrote:
> I don't know if this is what you are looking for but I have a GUI for rsync
> (Backuplist+) and now use unix "find directoryPath | wc -l" and it is very
> fast and gives you the total file count which reflects the rsync count in
> stats at the
On Apr 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:13 +0700, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>> I'm making a GUI for rsync and having some problems getting a reliable
>> indication of the files that will be transferred (so I can make a
>> progress bar f
I'm making a GUI for rsync and having some problems getting a reliable
indication of the files that will be transferred (so I can make a progress bar
from the results). I didn't see rysnc offered this so my plan has been to get a
list of files that will be transferred and count them as rsync rep
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:25 AM, CoolAtt NNA wrote:
> Hi ..
>
> Am using rsync to mirror all mailboxes to a backup server.
> I have configured rsync to run every 1 min. we have around 50 mailboxws for
> now.
> Plz advise if ok to run rsync every 1 min.
It depends on the mailbnox size, your hardwar
on the local
side? (and similar for 'r'/remote-side).
Many Thanks for any help,
-Ryan
r...@barwise> rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Christopher Hawkins
wrote:
> Hi fellas -
>
> as a part of my rsync command line on the client, I get almost 2x the
> throughput on local gig ethernet. It was a huge improvment...
I saw the same sorts of improvements... approximately 300% over a 45
Mbps pipe wit
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Neal B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Working a few servers that are transferring data across country with a 75ms
> delay on a GIGE connection. We can tune the tcp buffers on linux to improve
> the connections using iperf. Does rsync use the tcp buffers of the OS or
> does
//www.biggerbytes.be/
I don't have any direct experience with any of them, so I can't speak
to features, stability, etc., but there are some very cool ideas at
work, there. Whether you end up going this way, or not, I'd appreciate
hearing about what you tried and what experiences y
to take
advantage of rsync, maybe you can explain a little more about your
requirements, and people can make suggestions. I would ask two
questions:
- Do you absolutely need to have separate tarballs on the remote
side, per backup?
- Do the remote-side backups absolutely need to be compressed?
From: Bas Bahlmann || Steady IT Systeembeheer
> I am using rsync for my customers to have disaster recovery off-site
> with files from a VMware Server (under Linux). All works very well, but
> when I defragment the VM's (once a week) or Exchange defragments it's
> datastore the disk layout changes
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Why don't they just use Unison?
Because it doesn't work well. It is seriously unreliable with large
files, on Linux or Windows. It also has a horrifying tendency to
corrupt its own state databases, lock up, or exit unexpectedly. It
also doesn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Richard B.
Gilbert wrote:
> My machines run 24x7. They don't suck THAT much power.
A typical dual-socket server uses roughly 400 watts at idle. At a
rough US$0.10 per kWh, doubled for cooling, that's US$700 in power per
year. If you can save 50% of that by shutti
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> It still has to send the hashes, which can be slow for a large file.
> So it would be even better to cache on the sending side hashes of
> files on the receiving side, perhaps indexed by the receiving side's
> MD5 of the whole file.
The hashe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Hash calculation is very fast; rsync has a negligible cpu consumption.
Hash calculation for the receiver is usually disk-bound, But rsync has
massive CPU consumption in certain cases. When using -Z on a fast
network. I have seen rsync becom
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> Remembering hashes doesn't make any difference to speed, if the
> bottleneck is the sending side.
Except that in the rsync pipeline, the reading the destination file to
get hashes happens BEFORE the sender reads its file. And the sender
calc
Your log file indicates that rsync is indeed working as designed
finding lots of data matches:
Literal data: 123736377 bytes
Matched data: 17889663500 bytes
This means that rsync only had to transfer 118 MB instead of 16+ GB.
It does this by trading CPU and disk operations for network bytes
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> AFAIK there is no way to see the actual transfer-rate of the data-stream
> between the 2 rsync processes.
OS-level tools can show the actual bytes transferred on the wire (e.g.
perfmon in Windows).
--
RPM
--
Please use reply-all
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
> For people who don't know what it does, it implements backup of open files on
> Windows with rsync.
> My hope is to get something that works so well to have it included it in the
> cwrsync-installer:
> http://www.itefix.no/i2/cwrsync
> Thei
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM, wrote:
>> Only copying changed files is *exactly* what ROBOCOPY is designed for.
>> This is even the default behavior. It uses
>> filename+size+modification_time to determine if two files are the
>> same. ROBOCOPY also has an enromous number of logging options.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
> However your explanation made me realise why one 10GB uncompressed
> database.bak file (MSSQL) was not yielding any block matches at all... I
> contacted the admin for this db and surprise surprise, he insists on
> reindexing everyday...
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Hasanat Kazmi wrote:
> Hello,
> I have previously mailed on list that I am trying to port rsync to NT. I was
> wondering that whether CRC can be used to find check sums rather then
> rolling algorithm. I havnt found any document on web comparing rolling
> algorithm
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
> Thanks Ryan!
> In fact I found it's a combination of factors you mentioned... i.e. a
> compressed SQL .bak file, so contrary to what I thought, the fuzzy file was
> indeed being found but no matches were being found in t
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a file that changes slightly in size every day and has the timestamp
> appended to it.. for example on the 14th may:
> MybackedUpFileBlabla_200905140219.bak
> This is transferred by rsync to another server.
> The next day that
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:40 AM, David de Lama wrote:
> There are two opportunities for information loss in the ACL conversion:
>
> - PSIX ACLs support only read, write, and execute permissions. Thus,
> aspects of Windows ACLs that cannot be represented by a combination of
> read, write, and execu
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:58 PM, wrote:
> I've looked at robocopy, but it doesn't appear to have any
> mechanism to skip equal files and only copy files that have changed,
> even if it copies the whole file instead of a delta. (perhaps
> something could be rigged with the archive bit, though rdif
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Gero Pflanz wrote:
> Is it sufficient to change only those 2 parameters ?
> Will this also change the buffersize af the other host (via rsync
> communication)? In the logs I do not get any information that
> the sockopts parameter is changing something (although I
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> Is there any way to know *in advance* if using or not using "-z" could
> be the better solution?
I don't think so. You need to run your tasks on your own hardware and
network to see where the bottlenecks are.
If the task is CPU-bound, tur
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Daniel.Li wrote:
>> Upgrade to 3.0.5 (on both ends)
>
> OK, besides this, is there any other way to improve the network
> performance? some thing like change the option or what?
This is a well-known performance issue in rsync that was specifically
addressed in v3.0
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Mag Gam wrote:
> it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
http://rob.sun3.org/misc/parallelizing-rsync-processes/
--
RPM
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change opti
Hi, I have 2 Suggestion for rsync. 1)You should have a feature that
enables rsync to be able to manage a cluster of web servers with load
balancers, so if a person has 100 web servers connected together and
running them as a cluster with load balancers, rsync will mount all the
hard-drives of the 1
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
> ZFS on fuse is just too slow. I suppose I will wait for ZFS on Linux
> (pipe dream) or try to switch to Solaris 10 on x86
>
There will never be ZFS in the Linux kernel because of license
incompatibilites. The linux answer to ZFS is btrfs, which is
You can switch to a filesystem that supports transparent encrytpion
(Reiser, ZFS, NTFS, others depending on your OS). Rsync would be
completely unaware of any file-system level compression in that case.
Or you can use gzip with the --rsyncable option. Not all distributions
of gzip support --rsynca
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ryan Malayter wrote:
> You can switch to a filesystem that supports transparent encrytpion
> (Reiser, ZFS, NTFS, others depending on your OS). Rsync would be
> completely unaware of any file-system level compression in that case.
Oops. I meant &qu
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Tevfik Karagülle wrote:
> You may be interested in the cwRsync FAQ http://www.itefix.no/i2/node/11313
> about using RoboCopy for transferring windows file attributes/permissions:
>
I have recently started using ICACLS.EXE to dump permissions to a file
on the sour
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> I'm going to try the bandwidth limit and retries tomorrow. I wanted to see if
> there were some other suggestions.
We're using the latest cwRsync in daemon mode over IPsec to transfer
about 100 GB per day from several sources to our DR
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:46 AM, MW wrote:
> Anyway, I will try the --inplace option but cold
> you explain what you mean by "VSS snapshots" please?
Many modern operating systems have a "snapshot" function, which allows
you to save a point-in-time copy of the state of a file system for in
a space
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, MW wrote:
> Hi - I'm backing up a Windows client which has a number of Outlook mail
> archives (pst files) and annoyingly whenever you open Outlook it updates the
> modification dates of all pst files - even if you don't change any of the
> emails contained in the
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Hai Zaar wrote:
> I have the following situation: file2 on remote host and file1 on
> localhost. file1 and file2 are mostly the same. Simply running
> rsync remotehost:file2 file2
> will actually transfer the entire file. But I would like to use the
> factt that I
errors. I see this is a problem on SPARC is there a way around this
with linux? Any advice would be appreciated.
rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29
linux 2.6.24 i586
Thank you!
--
Ryan Rodriguez
Astrocom Corporation
http://www.astrocorp.com/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies t
against a NetApp R200 running OnTap 7.0.1-r1.
This has all worked previously without issue. Nothing has changed on the
client or server end. There must be some change in the data on the mount point
which rsync does not like. Thoughts?
Regards,
Ryan
--
To unsubscribe or change opti
Well... shouldn't be that much of a problem? Putting this tr command in
the pipe should help:
tr '\r' '\n'
You assume I am working in a sane environment. :)
A bigger issue may be that output is buffered when writing into a pipe,
which means you only get rsync's output when the buffer is
In trying to write a nice GUI for rsync, it was difficult to read
rsync's stdout
when using --progress, as --progress uses \r to make things pretty on
a terminal,
but it's painful to read into another process.
The attached patch made it much easier for me to read and parse the output from
--progr
ions of it.
CPR-Backup:
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?cpr-backup
Ryan
>>> "Jon Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/10/06 22:32 PM >>>
Does this list supports the NetWare version (rsync.nlm)? if not does anyone
know of a list that does? I'm hav
Because of the inefficiencies of using NFS to NFS rsync, would you not be
better using a native utility from filer to file, such as ndmp copy?
>>> Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/13/06 09:31PM >>>
I'm trying to sync up 54 million files. I can break
it down into different applications, but I still
ere a reason not to do this?
Thanks for any input..
Ryan
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Is it possible to use RSYNC to only delete files that exist at the destination,
but not the source. I would like RSYNC to remove files that exist at the
destination but do not exist at the source WITHOUT copying or creating any
additional files.
If RYSNC can't do this, does someone know a ni
e list is built. I can cd into this path, ls to my hearts
content, and cp and mv files to and from it.
What could be a cause of this error? I have verified my time is in sync with
the server. Thanks for any information anyone can provide. (RSYNC Version
2.6.5 SuSE 9.3 Pro Kernel 2.6.9).
Thank you for any insight anyone has.
Regards,
Ryan
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I want to to an
Rsync with 4 servers. I want to sync the passwd and shadow. But I
only want to do certain records to sync. basically all the user
info. Is there away that this can be done? or do I have to do the whole
file?
thank
you
Ryan
Holowaychuk
Owner - HGIlive
www.hgilive.com
Disregard my last post. After looking at the code it does appear the
default is to run as a different user when given certain options
regardless of the existence of uid=/gid= lines in the config. Adding
uid=0\ngid=0 to the config file solved that.
--
Ryan Sommers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
g here? I haven't looked at the source yet to see if rsync
is changing users anywhere but that is my next step.
--
Ryan Sommers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Wayne Davison said:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Ryan Sommers wrote:
>> Edited authorized_keys on M adding 'command="sudo /usr/local/bin/rsync
>> --server --daemon ."'
>
> You can't start an rsync daemon and then attempt to do a n
erve all file attributes and where the
files being backedup aren't all readable by a non-privileged user or owned
by the same user?
--
Ryan Sommers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
list = yes
read only = no
hosts allow = 192.168.100.24
I can not find that error code, appreciate the help
thanks
Ryan Holowaychuk
President
Holo Graphix Industries - HYPERLINK "http://www.hgilive.com/"www.hgilive.com
Director - BC Print and Image Association
Member - Rotary Club o
ave a fully functional system should host qin
suffer complete system failure by moving the entire directory structure
back to a hard drive on qin.
Since I'm new to rsync, can somebody tell me if I'm doing this right?
I'd hate to find out that I wasn't making proper backups after
directory at a time.
Like first rsync all the directories OMITTING individual files, and then
go through the directory tree and go all the way deep and rsync them
directory by directory instead of the whole tree at once.
Any one have any ideas on this?
Ryan
--
To unsubscribe or change options
.. and then it gets a bit further syncing up
the directories and then breaks again.. sometimes takes me upto 3 times to
run the rsync for it to finally complete.
It didn't start doing this till the list of files got really large.
Ryan
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
latest available from Cygwin
mirrors).
What other information can I provide that might help this get resolved?
Also, what's the recommended way of shutting off the signal handler (so
that I can ^C in gdb and not exit the program).
CC: me on replies please.
--
Ryan T. Sammartino
http://mem
68 matches
Mail list logo
