On 3. juni. 2009, at 19.31, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
On 3. juni. 2009, at 18.16, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because checking whether a process has a file open can be very
costly
in
system resources.
Not really. I'm writing some code doing thi
On 3. juni. 2009, at 18.16, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I would solve this not using rsync, but by writing the active file
in a
separate directory, or by first writing to a special filename and
renaming when done (like firefox adds .part to the
On 3. juni. 2009, at 12.34, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
We have a box here connected to an antenna receiving rather large
amounts of metheorological data from a satellite. the data is
received
and ransferred to another box and removed from the
doing md5sums for fils at both ends and
checking if I have the exact same file at both sides some time after
transfer. this works, but it's not really optimal.
Does anyone know if rsync could be better on this somehow?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685 / 98013356
r...@karlsbak
'
"scheduled tasks". Out of curiosity, why do you do this instead of
just sharing mypath on Samba?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685 / 98013356
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
intelligibelt. Det e
