jw schultz wrote:
[snip.. and thanks for all your comments]
>
Rsync doesn't perform well on non-local filesystems.
Really? Won't gigabit ethernet help for NFS, or maybe
Samba? I only have to rsync a relatively
low number of files, so no large directory scans.
Ron
--
Netland Internet Services
b
jw schultz wrote:
You have a couple of points wrong. The receiver generates
the block checksums. If you are pushing that would be the
server but if you are pulling it is the client. In 2.5.6
and earlier the transmitted block checksums are 6 bytes per
block with a default block size of 700 bytes
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:42:46AM +0200, Ron Arts wrote:
Dear all,
I am implementing a backup system, where thousands of postgreSQL
databases (max 1 Gb in size) on as much clients need to be backed
up nightly across ISDN lines.
Because of the limited bandwidth, rsync is the
CPU), and filesystem
limits.
Does anyone have experience with such setups?
Ron Arts
--
NeoNova BV
bedrijfsmatige internetoplossingen
http://www.neonova.nl Kruislaan 419 1098 VA Amsterdam
info: 020-5628292 servicedesk: 020-5628292 fax: 020-5628291
smime.p7s
Description: S
ndres of files at the
same time.
- How well does this scale up?
Does anyone have any experince with such setups?
Regards,
Ron Arts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
