Long pause.

2003-08-26 Thread Rogier Wolff
Hi everyone, I'm trying to rsync a large directory. After pondering on the list-of-files, it's now more or less doing nothing. It's running for over 4 hours now, not doing anything except eating CPUtime on the destination for over half an hour. I don't know what it was doing before that. The

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:48AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > > >

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > If we're going to make this more accurate it mig

Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-17 Thread Rogier Wolff
Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience * * ex

bwlimit patch.

2003-06-17 Thread Rogier Wolff
Hi, I Emailed this afternoon that bwlimit leads to a much too low bwlimit if small amounts of data are sent in each write. I wrote a small patch now. Congrats on the code: It's nice and clean: I wrote a working patch in 5 minutes after examining a total of 25 lines of code. (My backup used t

efficiency issue with rsync.....

2003-06-17 Thread Rogier Wolff
Hi rsync team, I thought that rsync would try to overlap computing and IO on both machines. I'm rsyncing a large tree (18G) and am keeping an eye on that. Suddenly my side completely stopped. No IO visible, no CPU time spent. The otherside was doing 100% CPU. Then the other side started to do