Re: batch applied: "Directory not empty (66)"

2005-12-09 Thread Raymond Keller
* Wayne Davison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20051209 12:10]: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:45:35PM -0800, Raymond Keller wrote: > > In my source I have a directory that changed to a file. I know this > > requires --force or --delete, but using --only-write-batch I get no > > err

batch applied: "Directory not empty (66)"

2005-12-07 Thread Raymond Keller
"rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29" In my source I have a directory that changed to a file. I know this requires --force or --delete, but using --only-write-batch I get no error until I attempt to apply the batch. This confused me for a bit. Is this intended behavior? Also, unrelatedly