Sorry, I think you'll need somebody else's help. (If I had to guess,
I'd take a look at the colon -- maybe you need two colons there -- it
does make a difference but I forget what difference it makes.)
Randy Kramer
S Peram wrote:
> It's just a 1kb file that I'
F on read_timeout" error often indicates something is
taking too much time on the server. Don't specify the -c option, don't
rsync more than one large file in a single rsync command, etc."
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/list
Monil Chheda wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to usr rsync utility to get the
> correct checksum ?
Try http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Wikilearn/RsyncingALargeFile and other
links on that page.
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
dable, and users could be less confused.
Just another $.02.
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
John Conover wrote:
> Is the rsync list alive?
The rsync list [EMAIL PROTECTED] is alive and well (AFAICT).
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
on is
mounted on the Linux box, it has those permissions.
Maybe there are other possibilities?
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Joseph Annino wrote:
> If my understanding is wrong and rsync does have the proper magic to copy
> just the differences within a file then rsync is even cooler than I thought.
rsync is cooler than you thought!
Randy Kramer
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/m
his accomplish what you need or are you looking for something
more?
hope this helps,
Randy Kramer
wiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Wikilearn/RsyncingALargeFile and the other
pages linked to it.
If you find any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, let me
know.
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
rint?. Does rsync need 100 bytes for each
file that might be transferred during a session (all files in the
specified directory(ies)), or does it need only 100 bytes as it does one
file at a time?
Trying to learn, also,
Randy Kramer
Tim,
Wonderful, thank you -- it is plain text!
Randy Kramer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Incidentally: I've deleted and reinstalled notes, in the hopes that the
> user preference for internet mail (TEXT ONLY, instead of HTML) has been
> honored. I set that as soon as i started,
e only problem -- for me, most HTML mail comes through in a very
small font that is unreadable. (I can read it by doing a view source or
something like that, if it seems interesting enough.)
(Tim's mail is coming through with this very small font.)
Randy Kramer
ms before starting to exchange data.
(All this is to the best of my recollection.)
Hope this helps!
Randy Kramer
Dale Phillips wrote:
>
> No. I am using aix 4.3 and rsh. I am wondering
> if it is some sort of a network glitch.
> Dale
>
> --- Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECT
Dave,
Thanks for the clarification, now that part is clear also!
Randy Kramer
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 06:57:14PM -0400, David Bolen wrote:
> [very good reply to Randy Kramer deleted]
>
> > > Aside: I think, based on your previous resp
ew one?
>
Sorry, I don't have any idea.
> Let me know if anybody has some general observations about using rsync with
> smbmount and how good a solution it is.
See above, but I'd be pleased to be proved wrong.
Hope this helps,
Randy Kramer
with a slice off the end of the original file. (I thought of that
myself actually, but thought --compare-dest was a better choice because
it was a built-in option -- now I'm clear that it's not.)
Thanks again!
Randy Kramer
David Bolen wrote:
>
> Randy Kramer [[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hen rsync would rsync the last 40
files in the normal manner (i.e., breaking them into blocks of 3000 to
8000 bytes and then comparing them, and transferring only the blocks
that were different).
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Note that if the target file ("mandrakefreq-i586
ps!
After I get my TWiki up and working, I will rewrite these instructions
and put them on my TWiki site. (I apologize because these are not as
clear as I would like -- they need to be rewritten -- I just don't have
the time right now.) I would appreciate corrections or clarifications
to the
'm not sure of the size (and it can be changed by a command
line parameter). His thesis includes data on performance of different
files with varying block sizes.
Hope this helps,
Randy Kramer
"A month of sundays ago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:"
> You've got two choices. Hack the code to do the updates in-place,
> or copy the disk images to a filesystem, and treat them as files.
Mmm ... partitions too large, I fear. Hacking the code seems the better
option. But I need to know if onl
m for Mandrake 7.0.
So, thanks very much to everyone who offered help! I'll be back!
Randy Kramer
Andrew Tridgell wrote:
>
> Here are some possible explanations:
>
> 1) you used --partial on an earlier attempt and interrupted the
>transfer. That would leave you with a p
rithm works, it's hard to
imagine a file transfer (under ncftp) that would be so bad as to have no
or few sections transferred correctly (even if I had done it in ASCII
mode). I've done iso transfers before using ncftp and have not had any
trouble.
Anyway.
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
M. Dr
done an ASCII transfer, and, I've done this before with no
problem. (But the previous instance was about 3 months ago and before
the ISP started cutting me off. I might have had to resume the previous
downloaded isos once or twice each.
Anyway, I remain puzzled. And, I'm trying to read Andrew Tridge's
thesis.
Randy Kramer
irrelevant at this point.)
6. The problem is due to the protocol mismatch. -- Not too likely --
this condition prevailed throughout the trials, even when I got the
"wrote 105 bytes read 85 bytes 20.00 bytes/sec" results.
7. Other??
Thanks for any help anyone can offer!
Randy Kramer
P
Rob,
Thanks for the explanation!
Randy Kramer
Rob Russell wrote:
> chroot is the act of changing the root directory of a filesystem as it
> appears to the process. (man 1 chroot)
>
> So, if I make an [x]inetd entry that calls "chroot /var/ssh sshd" instead
> of ssh
a root account, or
is it just that it's his "root" account, as a synonym for "home"
account? Must you do something to make the restricted account
"chrooted"? (I guess I'll have to look up "chroot" on google or
similar.)
Thanks again for the discussion!
Randy Kramer
Lachlan,
Thanks for the response! I haven't tried it yet, but does ssh with a
passphrase address your concern? If somebody steals your private key
can it be used without the passphrase?
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
PS: Thanks for the discussion. From what you've said and other things
(In this case only having an rsync
> based account)
>
> Lachlan.
>
> PS: If keeping rsync small is a priority for some people -
> compiling in an ssh module could be an option - as is done
> with apache modules to expand functionality.
If people feel ssh is essential, I would prefer that it be a module.
Thanks for the response!
Randy Kramer
ernal ssh would
presumably do better than any cut down version of ssh within rsync).
This modular approach also has the advantages of keeping rsync smaller,
and allowing rsync to use a different and better security system than
ssh if it comes into being.
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
Lachlan Cranswick wrote:
&
py and the remote copy. Would the -c option do something more than
would be done based on the date mismatch?
Also, in a subsequent email I raise the question about whether the
problem is because my local partition is a vfat partition. Any idea?
Thanks again!
Randy Kramer
M. Drew Streib wrot
Oops, did not mean to send this message -- see the next one. Also,
sorry about the wrapping.
Randy Kramer wrote:
>
> work properly>
>
> I tried Cameron's advice (touching the local copy of the iso), and the results
> are useful but disappointing -- it shows that rsync
not
change the permissions, and I think it is because the partition I am using
is a vfat partition. Does rsync have a problem with vfat partitions?
If not, can anybody spot another problem?
(I see that the protocol versions don't match -- is that the problem?)
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
PS: I
I tried Cameron's advice (touching the local copy of the iso), and the results
are useful but disappointing -- it shows that rsync is not updating the iso.
Below is the "transcript" of my run of rsync. I suspect the problem relates to
the "unexpected EOF in read_timeout", but I don't know exac
blem, I'll keep it running.)
With the partial option, will a partial file (.iso) be saved if the
connection is broken? (My ISP has taken to disconnecting me after 12
hours -- he changed the TOS.)
Thanks!
Randy Kramer
Mike Whitaker wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 03 April 2001 16:37, Randy
your help!
Randy Kramer
Randy Kramer wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> I'm now running rsync again with the options you specified. It has
> printed out a message:
>
> unexpected EOF in read-timeout
>
> but it is still using CPU (~85%, update checked again before sending
Mike,
Thanks very much! It's helpful to see the command that someone else
uses for the same purpose. I'll try the command with the options you
specified (after I look them up) -- if nothing changes I may try the
install.
Thanks again!
Randy Kramer
Mike Whitaker wrote:
>
&g
Thanks to all who responded!
Randy Kramer
Randy Kramer wrote:
>
> If someone sees this can you please respond? I don't know whether I'm
> getting through to the list or not -- I've seen no messages since I've
> signed up, and posted a few with no response.
>
> Thanks!
> Randy Kramer
If someone sees this can you please respond? I don't know whether I'm
getting through to the list or not -- I've seen no messages since I've
signed up, and posted a few with no response.
Thanks!
Randy Kramer
If someone sees this can you please respond? I don't know whether I'm
getting through to the list or not -- I've seen no messages since I've
signed up, and posted a few with no response.
Thanks!
Randy Kramer
) about Debian in March.
I've also been through help, man, and info, and several tutorials.
Thanks,
Randy Kramer
Can rsync fix a MandrakeFreq iso with a bad md5sum? (Without
re-downloading the entire file?)
How? (See my problems, below.)
I have rsync 2.3.2 protocol version 21 (Mandrake 7.
I tried to post some questions in the FAQ-O-Matic (on Sunday, IIRC).
The last two days I tried to check for responses -- but I get an
Internal Server Error when trying from either IE 5 on Windows or
Konqueror (2.1) on Linux (Mandrake 7.2).
Randy Kramer
ted some questions on the rsync faq-o-matic, but, for the
last two days I can't get back to it -- seems like they have a problem.
Should rsync work to solve this problem? How? Is there any chance the
md5sum posted at carroll is wrong? This is the md5sum I get each time:
f1a03f8a2b4637dc5
42 matches
Mail list logo
