Re: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest)

2010-04-05 Thread Randall Cotton
- Original Message - From: "Matt McCutchen" To: "Randall Cotton" Cc: Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:47 PM Subject: Re: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest) : On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 16:38 -0500, Randall Cotton wrote: : > - Original Message - : > From

Re: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest)

2010-04-05 Thread Randall Cotton
- Original Message - From: "Matt McCutchen" To: "Randall Cotton" Cc: Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:16 PM Subject: Re: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest) : On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 13:57 -0500, Randall Cotton wrote: : > This works as expected (a hard link is made

Re: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest)

2010-04-05 Thread Randall Cotton
rd links to be made instead of copies. Agreement? Disagreement? R - Original Message ----- From: "Randall Cotton" To: Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:57 PM Subject: This is a bug, right? (--link-dest) : I had a heckuva time getting hard link snapshot backups to work. I traced

This is a bug, right? (--link-dest)

2010-04-05 Thread Randall Cotton
I had a heckuva time getting hard link snapshot backups to work. I traced my troubles down to what appears to be an rsync bug: This works as expected (a hard link is made) rm -rf a b mkdir a b echo foo > a/tmp rsync -a a/ b/a.1 rsync -a --link-dest=../a.1 a/ b/a ls -i b/*/tmp the abo