Nope. It would be better to integrate GSS and/or SASL support.
PAM is best for initial authentication handling (e.g., user/password).
GSS / SASL are best for network authentication (e.g., Kerberos, PKI,
etc...).
Nico
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:19:00PM +0100, Rief, Jacob wrote:
> Hi,
> Would'n
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:26:14PM -0500, David Bolen wrote:
> But the rub I always get into is the question of how do I know that a
> cached set of checksum information is actually for a given file. That
> is, if I store checksums for file x.y in x.y.checksum, how do I
> positively know that the
See PRCS version 2, by Josh MacDonald. It does all that you seem to be
asking for (project version control, binary diff algorythm based on
RSYNC, disconnected ditributed repositories, etc...). One of the white
papers even describes how PRCS version 2 can be used to synchronize
laptop data with the
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:34:25PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Let's not argue. You were saying modularity is not impossible, I was
> saying it's not trivial. We're both right.
:)
> This points out another consideration: some people care most about CPU
> time (e.g. large Debian mirrors), some
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:49:57AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2000, Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It's not impossible to be modular and fast, it's just much harder than
> > > doing either one independently.
>
> >
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:21:27AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2000, Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A re-write would be good. Make the new protocol modular. Make rsync
> > itself modular. By modular I mean that delta engines, compres
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 07:08:22PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Here's a quick history:
>
> In the beginning was rsync, which is a file transfer protocol.
> At the moment I look after the day-to-day stuff, and tridge watches
> the evolution.
>
> rsync gave rise to Josh Macdonald's XDelta, which i
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:54:26PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2000, Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My guess is that if the SSHv2 spec issues are cleared up then SSHv2 is
> > the best possibility for rsync. I don't mean using SSH with rsy
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:03:19AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2000, Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you just embed arcfour, what's your key management plan?
>
> key = MD4(salt, user, password, possibly other stuff)
>
> The salt is sent on each new connection; at the moment
Use lsof instead of pfiles if you have lsof available.
I have a version of strace for Solaris 2.6 that I fixed to grok socket
calls. It doesn't grok *64() calls, unfortunately, but I will someday
fix it to do so. It's not in any shape that cna be contributed back to
the strace project and it's r
10 matches
Mail list logo
