Re: smbclient socket options

2013-03-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.03.2013 12:38, basteon wrote: > Hi, > smbclient -N -L 172.22.27.10 -O keepalive=10 > Not working client anyway wait long time, how use keepalive for > notexisten services or filtered? Hmm. How this is related to rsync? Thanks, /mjt -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting

Re: --link-dest isn't linking

2012-04-22 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 23.04.2012 06:42, Henri Shustak wrote: > >> rsync -Ha --link-dest=/media/4tb/bak/panic-2012-01-01 >> /media/2tb/bak/panic-2012-02-01 /media/4tb/bak/ > > It seems that you may be attempting to hard-link between two file systems. > One is mounted as "/media/4tb" the other is mounted as "media/

Re: [Bug 8198] New: rsync does not set TZ variable after chroot(), which confuses logging timestamps

2011-06-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.06.2011 14:06, samba-b...@samba.org пишет: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8198 > >Summary: rsync does not set TZ variable after chroot(), which > confuses logging timestamps >Product: rsync >Version: 3.1.0 > Platfor

read-batch: Skipping batched update..No batched update inconsistency

2010-10-20 Thread Michael Tokarev
I already asked this question before, some time ago (a few months), but got no reply. We're using a backup system based on rsync and batched updates. Quite often I see a situation when rsync refuses to apply next batch with the following messages: applying f0002.rgs-podm.ru 142 (Skipping batched

skipping and not finding batched updates with extra --link-dest?

2010-05-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hello. This is my first post here ;) I've been using rsync heavily for quite some time. For one, we use it to perform offline backups of numerous machines into single location. Since the systems are basically identical, it's wise to keep only different files, hard-linking identical ones. That w