RE: move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?

2001-12-06 Thread Keating, Tim
If you're serious about not using CVS (and I've used it, I understand why you might be :), may I suggest Perforce? It's a commercial product but it is free for use on open-source projects. The only complication would be you'd need to find a server to host it. I can say definitively that it ROCKS.

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems

2001-11-29 Thread Keating, Tim
query your database to tell you which extents have data that has been modified within a certain timeframe? > -Original Message- > From: David Bolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:12 PM > To: 'Keating, Tim' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems

2001-11-29 Thread Keating, Tim
Not sure, I am re-running this to ensure that I was not smoking crack at the time :) > -Original Message- > From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:12 PM > To: Keating, Tim > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rsync: R

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems

2001-11-29 Thread Keating, Tim
I was at first, but then removed it. The results were still insufficiently fast. > Were you using the -c option of rsync? It sounds like you > were and it's > extremely slow. I knew somebody who once went to > extraordinary lengths to > avoid the overhead of -c, making a big patch to rsync to

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesystems

2001-11-29 Thread Keating, Tim
I, too, was disappointed with rsync's performance when no changes were required (23 minutes to verify that a system of about 3200 files was identical). I wrote a little client/server python app which does the verification, and then hands rsync the list of files to update. This reduced the optimal