Re: weak checksum

_OFFSET is? Cheers Julian 2009/9/24 Julian Pace Ross > Hi, > I'm curious if anybody knows the exact reason why the weak checksum > calculation is slightly different to the standard adler-32 checksum as seen > for example here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adler-32 ? > > T

weak checksum

Hi, I'm curious if anybody knows the exact reason why the weak checksum calculation is slightly different to the standard adler-32 checksum as seen for example here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adler-32 ? Thanks Julian -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing

Re: rsync is fantastic except for one usual feature we want from it .. please help ?

You're probably looking for the option " --existing". You can also play around with --update, --ignore-existing, and --remove-source-files off the top of my head... not sure which combination will work for you. 2009/6/22 Low, Alex > Hi, > > > > Rsync is a fantastic program, and it does everyth

Re: --fuzzy question

urse. Anyway thanks again for your very useful suggestions. 2009/5/20 Ryan Malayter > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Julian Pace Ross > wrote: > > Thanks Ryan! > > In fact I found it's a combination of factors you mentioned... i.e. a > > compressed SQL .bak fi

Re: --fuzzy question

nto the find_fuzzy function, but i'm not sure if there's > anything I can tweak in there to make this work. > > Thanks for any help > Julian > > -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://l

--fuzzy question

I am assuming that this is because I have both a change in name AND a change is size/modtime? I was looking into the find_fuzzy function, but i'm not sure if there's anything I can tweak in there to make this work. Thanks for any help Julian -- Please use reply-all for most replies to

Re: no matches in file

: 665655 Cheers Julian 2009/2/4 Julian Pace Ross > It was a local copy, but I did indeed use --no-whole-file!! Any clue? > the output shows below shows it: (delta-transmission enabled would be it i > guess) > > 1 file to consider > server_recv(2) starting pid=1820 >

Re: no matches in file

ata\Backup\pcutbak.bak) 2009/2/4 Wayne Davison > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > > Hi, I have two versions of a file that in theory should be quite > similar... > > however, the transfer is taking more or less the same time as though the &g

no matches in file

: total: matches=0 hash_hits=411107964 false_alarms=11057 data=1053238900 I guess this means that no blocks matched with the strong checksum?? What are hash hits exactly? Thanks Julian PS The full output is a lot of text, but I can send it. Just in case I will just give the -- stats output for now

Re: Backup Microsoft Exchange

This should be simple: Use ntbackup to create a large .bkf file at a scheduled time. This will itself use shadow copy, so for this purpose (exchange) you really don't need to get into the VSS SDK. Moreover, I compress and encrypt that file with rsyncrypto (internally pipes to gzip with the --r

Moved files

ol feature. Cheers Julian -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: speedup remains 1

Again, in a nutshell: it's as though --whole-file is being specified.. though i'm quite sure it's not implied in this case. From: Julian Pace Ross Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:11 PM To: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: speedup remains 1 Hi List, I'm observing a stra

speedup remains 1

limit. The file is indeed the same one, since it is not being deleted, and in the directory i get: -rwx-- 1 user users 6351191494 2008-05-06 19:30 backup.bak* -rwx-- 1 root root 493617152 2008-05-07 12:31 .backup.bak.2UIWpi* Anyone got a clue to what might lead to this? Thanks Jul

Re: rsync ignores include rule - analogic to other that works

Ah, stupido me, of course different filesystem. Thanks a lot. Matt McCutchen wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:01 +0200, Julian Davchev wrote: I have this rsync to backup specific directories from one PC to another in local network. All is working smooth except for /storage dir. I just don&#

rsync ignores include rule - analogic to other that works

Hi, I have this rsync to backup specific directories from one PC to another in local network. All is working smooth except for /storage dir. I just don't get why as I am using exact same why as I do for other dirs that work. I see that it matches it like e.g [sender] showing directory /storage be

Re: --partial and --delete

Thanks Paul, understood. - Original Message - From: "Paul Slootman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:32 PM Subject: Re: --partial and --delete On Fri 25 Jan 2008, Julian Pace Ross wrote: I need to use --partial (without using --partial-dir

--partial and --delete

using --delete-after be sufficient to get the desired effect? Thanks, Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

rsync on OS/400

Hi everyone, I've been asked: can rsync run on an IBM I series with OS/400 ? I have no idea what this OS is like, and can't seem to find anything on Google. Thanks Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting,

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

that amount to a few GB, but definitely not to bring down to 569MB.. so that value in the first case is definitely wrong. Has there been a patch for this? Thanks again Julian - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ro

Help! What is this error??

Hi all, I am running the following command from winXP: rsync -av -e "bin\ssh -i trans_key\access.key -l julian -p 2227" 192.168.200.254::julian .\julian\ and getting the following output: rsync: Failed to dup/close: Socket operation on non-socket (108) rsync error: error in IPC cod

rsync / cygwin / vista

first things I tried on it... Anyone got a clue? Thanks Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

copy file upon --delete possible?

code a "copy_file" to a fixed trash directory before unlink... Any suggestions?? Cheers Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Number of files to be transferred?

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 February 2007 21:52 To: Julian Pace Ross; rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Number of files to be transferred? Unfortunately, the data I am transferring is many hundreds of gigabytes, mounted on NFS shares that reside on NetApp filers, and is being transferred to l

RE: Number of files to be transferred?

If you perform a dry run (-n) with --stats, before the actual run (will only add an overhead of typically a few seconds. a few minutes at worst depending on size) you can get an idea of the "number of files to be transferred" and "total transferred file size", although the latter is (as adequately

syntax wrong?

I'm using -a and --files-from, (the -r being automatically "non-implied" due to the --files-from). What's happening is I get Dir1 and Dir2 on the receiver, but with no files at all in them. Tried a few things, but can't seem to make it work. Anyone got a clue? Julian -

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

Patched it and seems to be working fine now. Thanks Wayne..much appreciated. On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:16:27PM +0100, Julian Pace Ross wrote: Would [it] be simple to make a patch for this for 2.6.9? I have worked up a patch for 2.6.9 that fixes the file-size total and the received byte

Re: daemon sizes

Thanks wayne/matt Would be simple to make a patch for this for 2.6.9? I would love this feature to work on a server without shifting to 3.0.0 cvs on this particular machine as yet... Cheers Julian - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

daemon sizes

6 GB, which was what was actually received in this run. am i missing something here? This is 2.6.9 btw. Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: include/exclude

Thanks for the insight! Up and running now. - Original Message - From: "Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:40 PM Subject: Re: include/exclude On 1/16/07, Julian Pac

Re: include/exclude

OK thanks! - Original Message - From: "Christophe LYON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:54 PM Subject: Re: include/exclude You can still use --filter: --filter=": my-rsync-f

include/exclude

help? Regards Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: strange file sizes in log

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:12 PM Subject: Re: strange file sizes in log On 1/9/07, Julian Pace Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also does this have anything to do with the bytes sent/received bei

Re: strange file sizes in log

quot; when I would have just transferred several Megs. Again, thanks - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:53 PM Subject: Re: strange file sizes in

Re: strange file sizes in log

Cheers Wayne, Will there be a nightly update? (cant CVS) - Original Message - From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:09 PM Subject: Re: strange file sizes in log On

Re: strange file sizes in log

Dear List, I have noticed something regarding this: running the following command from a WinXP: rsync -av --progress --stats -e "ssh -l julian -i rsync_key" \ "/cygdrive/c/FILES/" 192.168.100.100::filesbak gives the following log output on the receiving side (rsync 2.6.9 /

strange file sizes in log

irst operation: sent 69019827 bytes received 22416 bytes 288276.59 bytes/sec total size is 68937712 speedup is 1.00 Any clues? Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Rsync + SSH on a different port + restricted access

I found that adding the following at the beginning of the key on recv. side works perfectly for me with any rsync command on the sending side. from="10.1.1.1",command="/home/remoteuser/cron/validate-rsync" ssh-dss B3Nza C1kc3MAAAEBAKYJenaYvMG3nHwWxK... etc...then create the file "validate-rsync

Re: --files-from

:/home/julian/abc/home/julian/xyzIf after backing up several times, /home/julian/xyz is removed from the list in file foo, and it follows that it is not considered for transfer. However, it remains in existence on the receiver. Is there any way around this (in a "--delete" type of way

--files-from

"--delete" type of way) in order to delete directories no longer specified in the list from the receiver? Thanks Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Rsync error on client end: unexpected tag 3 [sender]

Hi Wayne,I am getting the "unexpected tag 3" error quite often when pushing using 2.6.8CVS on cygwin /WinXP to 2.6.8CVS on Linux over SSH (no daemon).The CVS version is pre tag-3.patch that you had posted. I can compile with this patch on both sides (using cygwin on the client).However from the pre

Re: Time entries in rsync log

This happened to me too (2.6.3) Have never looked into it deeply, but I did notice that this happens with the hour value only. I have since changed to 2.6.8 but I cant remember whether this kept happenning or not. Mark, Oren wrote: Hi,   I get strange time entries

Re: rsync speed

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Pace Ross Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 4:22 AM To: Wayne Davison Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: rsync speed Pushing the file from Windows to

Re: rsync speed

ted daemon on your Linux box. I know, but I'm trying to simulate transfer over an internet conncetion on my lan first. I'll experiment further and let you know what I come up with... but I'm quite sure its something particular to my setup. Thanks wayne! Julian -- To unsubscribe

rsync speed

\ssh -i key\access.key -l pluto -p 22" [EMAIL PROTECTED]::plutofiles "/cygdrive/C/plutofiles/"      Thanks, Julian   -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Encryption

solution.. maybe I can then help with the devel. Also the same in case of errors (invalid certificate etc..) but if anything those go to the rsyncrypto list. Cheers Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb

Re: Encryption

ument... that would be idealoh well just a thought... Cheers Julian   -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Encryption

 medium to good knowledge of C, but before delving into understanding the rsync source, I wanted to hear any opinions on how possible, if at all, this is...   Julian     -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org

Re: how safe is it to rsync databases?

From: rsync-bounces+tony= [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]On Behalf Of Julian Pace RossSent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:35 AMTo: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: how safe is it to rsync databases? I'm interested to hear feedback on this, since I was intending to backup a myS

Re: how safe is it to rsync databases?

I'm interested to hear feedback on this, since I was intending to backup a mySQL database 'on the fly' daily... Anyone?   On 09/04/06, Veronica Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi people!   I've been hunting around the web for an answer to this question for acouple of days now.  I run the IT fo

Re: logging problems

OK that was it!!! It is now working perfectly!! Well done & thanks for your patience :) Julian  On 08/04/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 11:08:25AM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote:> Hi Wayne, yes indeed there is something output before the 'rsyn

Re: logging problems

me); to output this string to the logs just after rprintf(FLOG, "connect from %s (%s)\n", host, addr);   The result is empty: Apr  8 10:46:23 mail sshd[30537]: Accepted publickey for julian from :::192.168.10.50 port 1146 ssh2Apr  8 10:46:23 mail rsyncd[30540]: forward name lookup for

Re: logging problems

s for your time! Reg. Julian  On 06/04/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:26:16PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote:> I would just like to confirm that the problem is with my setup: > Using both 2.6.7 with patch, and then 2.6.8cvs ("nightly")A

Re: logging problems

Hi Wayne, Thanks for your mail. I would just like to confirm that the problem is with my setup: Using both 2.6.7 with patch, and then 2.6.8cvs ("nightly"), I have the following scenario: On linux box 1 (Suse), in /home/julian I have an rsyncd.conf, including the global options:

Re: logging problem

y the other day, persisted even after solely applying the clientserver.c patch you had posted.  On 02/04/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:40:45PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote:> I downloaded 2.6.7, carefully applied the log-file.diff patch, then>

Re: logging problem

igured the problem has nothing to do with those...   Julian  On 01/04/06, Julian Pace Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some bad news unfortunately.. what I did is exactly this: I downloaded 2.6.7, carefully applied the log-file.diff patch, then applied the patch Wayne posted yesterday.   What&

Re: logging problem

ng skipped altogether.. I lack the resources to look into it deeper than this... I wonder if anyone can replicate this? ..Julian  On 31/03/06, Julian Pace Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK! ... will recompile and fire-up. Thanks Wayne   On 31/03/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: logging problem

OK! ... will recompile and fire-up. Thanks Wayne   On 31/03/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:11:38PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote:> What is bothering me is that I lost the ability to write in any file > other than syslog (/var/log/messages)The pr

Re: logging problem

Yep guys thats exactly it! I'm running 2.6.7pre3. Just tried the syslog facility option and it didnt work either. I'll keep trying to get out some clues before delving into the src... Let me know if you find anything. Cheers Julian On 31/03/06, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: logging problem

  Yep I tried those two options, and nothing... Even if the pre-user conf files have a log file in the same directory, which I touch before trying, messages keep going to syslog... I tried with 666 permissions on rsyncd.log too just to make sure...   The following is one of the user's conf file,

lgging problem

just wants to log into syslog. Is it possible to have a custom log file as with the daemon running?   Thanks Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Unnecessary directory listing.

ocess... but in vain... Any ideas??? Thanks Julian -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: rsync using sudo via remote shell

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Achim St?bler wrote: > > rsync -avz -e "ssh -i /home/backup/.ssh/id_dsa" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ > > /backup/server/ > > > > Unfortunately I can't figure out how to tell rsync to execute its remote > > instance via su

Re: Mac OS X HFS+ metadata patch, take 2

's some dormant Mac code in the mpack distribution to handle "simple applesingle/appledouble encoding/decoding" (macfile.c) that appears to handle comments. According to the release notes, the Mac code probably doesn't compile anymore, but maybe it can be reworked. http://ftp.

Re: Mac OS X HFS+ metadata patch, take 2

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, D Andrew Reynhout wrote: > Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer > Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to > non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc). > > I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions > of