Re: source side

2005-06-11 Thread Juergen Busam
John Van Essen wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Juergen Busam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Yes, the source side is a CIFS share on a NetApp filer and YES, they >>change everytime I run rsync and they go back another hour. >>no, they do NOT restore to their &q

Re: source side

2005-06-11 Thread Juergen Busam
o back another hour each > time? Or do you unmount the windows share and remount it and the > timestamps are restored to their "normal" unchanged values? > > John > > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Juergen Busam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I&#x

Re: source side

2005-06-10 Thread Juergen Busam
ourceside is mounted readonly! Nevertheless the timestamp gets changed... Wayne Davison wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:27:42AM +1000, Juergen Busam wrote: > >>I still have my formerly mentioned timestamp problem. IS rsync changing >>the timestamps on the sourceside? >

source side

2005-06-09 Thread Juergen Busam
Can anyone tell me what rsync is doing on the sourceside, if I rsync one local directory to another local directory, with the parameters -av --delete-after ? I still have my formerly mentioned timestamp problem. IS rsync changing the timestamps on the sourceside? Thanks Juergen -- To unsubscribe

Re: timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread Juergen Busam
appen? Juergen Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:24:50PM +1000, Juergen Busam wrote: > >>how is it possible that the files age a few hours on the source? > > > If you're running at least 2.6.4, use the -i option to see a summary of > what differences rsy

timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread Juergen Busam
Hi all! I'm syncing a windows share from a NetApp filer to a local partition on my RHEL3 box. I observe the following behavior: - rsync syncs more than neccessary, files that haven't changed since years - files that have been synced, aged for an hour or two on the netapp host Environment: cifs