xplain how and why this happens? What scenario might lead to it?
Thanks,
Gareth
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Kevin Korb wrote:
> Rsync should stop deleting as soon as it hits an error unless you are
> using --force or --ignore-errors.
Most definately not using either, as the correct operation of
delete-after shows.
> Also, set these in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf:
> snapshot_autoextend_
I've implemented a backups system and have come across a problem with
delete-during and I/O errors.
Currently I use a wrapper round rsync to create a LVM snapshot and rsync
the snapshot, this works except that when the snapshot threshhold is
exceeded LVM removes the snapshop, the mount fails an
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, david reinares wrote:
> It would be greatful to have crypting funcionality added to rsync, appart
> from using ssh to crypt transmissions.
>
> I know this is not the original purpose for rsync, but anyway it's a fact
> that many people need (at least i need, I hope I'm not alo
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Tevfik Karagülle wrote:
> A new version of cwRsync is available now. Enjoy!
I'd enjoy it more if you got rid of that stupid installer.
Go back to when it was just a set of files please, we don't all use
Windows like Windows users.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https:/
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
> Chris rapier has been working on a fix for this, see:
>http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
> Note this affects anything using ssl, like scp, sftp, rsync -e ssh, etc.
None of those things use *SSL/TLS* ...
There may indeed be a pro
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I notice that appends to text files results in the whole file being
transferred (as recorded by 'Total bytes written') rather than just
the 9 characters I append to the file.
I assume you're doi
whole thing, because the LAN overhead will
waste the savings in WAN.
I was looking for the opposite of this :-) Wayne kindly pointed it out,
--no-whole-file.
I guess this should only be used for low bandwidth WAN connections?
Tim - Thanks for your help, and for taking the time to show a sample
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
Using -a, -t or -c (vvv
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
Wayne... Thanks for the
?
Regards
Gareth
example:
I create a file called 'testfile' in /tmp/play containing the current
date and time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/play# l
total 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/play# date > testfile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/play# l
total 4
-rw-r--r--1 root root 29 Jun 16 1
Slackware-9.0/9.1 base.
I've come across a problem.
A source file of 3.0G and a destination existing image of 5.1G - the
destination has a lot of stuff which is to be discarded but does contain
all of the data in the source except for about 50M.
This should have been a quick transfer, even thoug
12 matches
Mail list logo