Re: The behavior of "-u/--update" option on directories

2003-01-14 Thread Florian-Daniel Otel
Aaron W Morris writes: > > > > Truth to be told, after a bit of thinking I _might_ accept the fact > > that "--update" ignores the timestamps on (sub)directories. Because > > if it didn't, if any file was "touch"-ed remotely after the last rsync > > than all subdirs, up to and including to the

Re: The behavior of "-u/--update" option on directories

2003-01-13 Thread Florian-Daniel Otel
e the last put...well, than that's it. Again, thanks in advance to anyone can suggest a way to have rsync __also__ in this way. Best regards, Florian > Florian-Daniel Otel wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have the following problem: I use the following command to &q

The behavior of "-u/--update" option on directories

2003-01-13 Thread Florian-Daniel Otel
Dear all, I have the following problem: I use the following command to "push" files from "local" to a "remote" machine: [...] /usr/bin/rsync -avuz -e "ssh -1" --exclude ".Xauthority" --delete /user/home/directory/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/user/home/directory/ ; (The ssh is using RSA authenticatio