Wayne:
Thank you for responding.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Doug Robinson > wrote:
>
>> I was wondering what folks thought of a proposal to enhance rsync to be
>> able to create and maintain a cache of {f
fication by reseting the 64-bit mtime (a
trick noted in https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2011-August/026676.html
).
That last URL was a find by one of my co-workers. Now I need to go track
the "db.diff" patch that Wayne notes and see if I can tweak it to do the
64-bit
stuff and so o
AND doing the necessary CPU
intensive checksum computation. It would be a huge win.
Thank you.
Doug
>On 03/11/2014 06:11 PM, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Folks:
>>
>> When using rsync to copy huge amounts of data I've found that a
>> significant amount of time is spent
Ah, forgot to mention that we can't preserve time-stamps and matching byte
counts are false negatives so we really need to use file checksums as
comparisons.
Thanks again.
Doug
--
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
t. 925-396-1125
e. doug.robin...@wandisco.com
--
Join us in New York and San Franci
Folks:
When using rsync to copy huge amounts of data I've found that a significant
amount of time is spent computing the checksums. Sometimes hours, ...
sometimes days - it depends on the total amount of data checked! And after
that sometimes it's only a few files that need to be updated.
I've
