Re: [RFC PATCH] Add SHA1 support

On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:17:09 PM CET, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: On 2020-03-17 00:03:03 [+0100], Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: On Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:34:53 PM CET, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior via rsync wrote: I'm still not sure if rsync requires a cryptographic

Re: [RFC PATCH] Add SHA1 support

On Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:34:53 PM CET, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior via rsync wrote: I'm still not sure if rsync requires a cryptographic hash _or_ if a strong hash like xxHash64 would be just fine for the job. I'm fairly sure the hash should *not* be easy to spoof, so I'd say a cryptog

Re: Would you expect --perms -M--fake-super to set the file mode to the original one?

ferent than the ones in the xattr which set does it use? On 3/16/20 10:01 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: Thanks. This is a bit counter-intuitive to me. So how would you tell rsync to store the original permissions in the xattr, but do not touch the real file mode? On Thursday, March 12,

Re: Would you expect --perms -M--fake-super to set the file mode to the original one?

provided modified by the --chmod. I wouldn't expect the receiver to even know the other permissions. On 3/12/20 1:23 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: Thank you for the feedback, I'm glad to see that different people see the issue differently. As a followup question, what would

Re: Would you expect --perms -M--fake-super to set the file mode to the original one?

ms at all. On 3/12/20 12:46 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: rsync --perms -M--fake-super src dst For me, this command means that rsync should save the original perms in the xattr, and leave the real file mode to the umask default. Currently it also modifies the real file mode, and

Would you expect --perms -M--fake-super to set the file mode to the original one?

rsync --perms -M--fake-super src dst For me, this command means that rsync should save the original perms in the xattr, and leave the real file mode to the umask default. Currently it also modifies the real file mode, and there is no way to store something different in the xattr. According to

Re: How Can I save the original permissions while setting g+rX for all files

works on both the real permissions and the permissions in the xatttr. Maybe the behavior has changed since whatever version you have (3.1.3 here) but this probably wouldn't help you either. On 12/8/19 7:56 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: Hello list! Combining -M--fake-super with --

How Can I save the original permissions while setting g+rX for all files

Hello list! Combining -M--fake-super with --chmod ends up changing the permissions stored in the fake-super xattrs. I.e. the permissions stored in the xattr, are affected by --chmod. The desirable behaviour for me would be for --chmod to modify the real permissions of the destination files. Th

Re: GSOC organisation for rsync?

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: Hello list, I have an interesting idea for improving rsync and I'd love to work on it as part of GSOC. Is there a proper organisation to submit my rsync-related proposal? Even though I got no reply here, I got a negative reply from the

GSOC organisation for rsync?

Hello list, I have an interesting idea for improving rsync and I'd love to work on it as part of GSOC. Is there a proper organisation to submit my rsync-related proposal? Thanks in advance, Dimitris -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe o