FIXED (ignore) Re: F'ing hell (documentation problem)

This is on "dev", a Mandrake Linux 9.0 box: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rsync]$ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 [...]

F'ing hell (documentation problem)

Hello. I'm trying something from the rsync man page and it is failing. From http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync.html: CONNECTING TO AN RSYNC SERVER OVER A REMOTE SHELL PROGRAM It is sometimes useful to b

Re: "Doh!", or: The Sync'ing Feeling I Get With Recursion

> Yours is a very unusual request. A directory isn't in sync > unless all its subdirs are. I'm using Linux 2.4's DNotify signal to keep nodes of a cluster in sync in "realtime". > This can be accomplihed with --exclude > /*/ == no recursion > /*/*/ == only top level sub

"Doh!", or: The Sync'ing Feeling I Get With Recursion

This message describes (imho) a behaviour bug in rsync. I'm going to submit a patch, but before I dive into the code I want to know what the actual desired behaviour should be. In other words, please comment. I have some directories I want to keep synchronised between two machin

Re: rsync + SSL

> if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or another? It's been done for some time. See 'stunnel' at Google. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.

Re: Problem with checksum failing on large files

> My theory is that this is expected behavior given the check sum size. Craig, Excellent analysis! Assuming your hypothesis is correct, I like the adaptive checksum idea. But how much extra processor overhead is there with a larger checksum bit size? Is it worth the extra c

Re: Problem with checksum failing on large files

> same version of rsync at both ends would avoid the problem. His original post showed that this happens acrossed various operating systems with matching versions (2.5.2 and 2.5.5 matched up, and then 2.5.2 and 2.5.5 mismatched, over SunOS and AIX). Could you try to reproduce this

Re: Problem with checksum failing on large files

> I'm having a problem with large files being rsync'd twice because of the > checksum failing. I think this was reported recently. Please try using the "-c" option ("always checksum") and see if the makes the problem go away. This is a high priority bug for me (although

Re: multiple sessions to same destination

oad the final, uncorrupted version of "bigfile.mov" to BigServer? Any help is greatly appreciated. I've read all the docs I could find but did not see this addressed. Thank You, Derek Simkowiak dereks at itsite dot com [...] -- Since that email I have learned that rs

Re: Rsync synchronizes unchanged files

> P.S.: The purpose of this work is to maintain a computer lab running > Windows XP and other systems. Get the latest version. From http://rsync.samba.org/ : --- rsync 2.5.5 "Snowy River" (2 April 2002) [...] BUG FIXES: [...] * Fix --wh

Server writes...?

ame time? Or, does the rsync daemon guarantee that the last person (the 3rd team member to connect to BigServer) gets to upload the final, uncorrupted version of "bigfile.mov" to BigServer? Any help is greatly appreciated. I've read all the docs I could find but did not see this