Hi Whit,
> This leads me to ask for any advice to work around this, other than
> running
> it manually every time so I can abort when the real work is done, and
> before
> the system load goes to that permanent spike > 10.
What does strace say it's doing while the load
Hi Zito,
> Hello,
> I faced the problem of synchronization block devices and found the patch
> write-devices.diff by Darryl Dixon, that went trough this mailing list
> http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2009-October/024037.html
>
> Unfortunately the patch was one flaw for me.
Hi List,
I haven't had any response to this mail over the last week - does no-one
have any comments or opinion? I highly doubt my code is pristine and
perfect ;) Is there a possibility that this patch could be included in the
general rsync-patches distribution?
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winter
capture the delete events and remove the files with
some other helper script, rather than use rsync directly (rsync doesn't
give any advantage in that scenario except to be able to re-use the
existing network transport mechanism).
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
http://www.winte
with the
--files-from option. This works very effectively and quickly.
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
http://www.winterhouseconsulting.com
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/
que etc to improve the robustness and quality of the
patch.
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
http://www.winterhouseconsulting.com
8<---[snip]
diff -ru rsync-3.0.6/generator.c rsync-3.0.6-writedev/generator.c
--
ry 5 minutes during the day I ship all the files changed in the
previous 5 minutes offsite to the backup server. This works perfectly -
and the volume of change is about 30,000 new files per day!
Email me direct if you want more details :)
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
htt
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:48 -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> Darryl Dixon wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find
> > an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why
> > isn&
than a quarter
century of unix tradition, and certainly caught me by surprise the first
time I encountered it. Can anyone enlighten me?
regards,
Darryl Dixon
Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
http://www.winterhouseconsulting.com
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listin