On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Here's a patch that should handle the above idea:
> http://pastebin.com/UTbtFu8Ta
Unknown Paste ID!
Regardless, all your suggested changes still improve the capability of
rsync to run simultaneously on the same tree, so it sounds good. My
Any comments?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Alex Jurkiewicz wrote:
> Hi all,
> These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
> side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
> The second patch ignores files with this
Hi all,
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The second patch ignores files with this token when using --cvs-ignore.
http://pastebin.com/DL1jCNfm
http://pastebin.com/yy9duP8Z
The behav
