On 24.12.24 09:53, Mario Marietto via rsync wrote:
There are times when a large file is copied up to 99% and then deleted after
having received the error. Other times when the error occurs earlier and only a
part of it is copied. Does it make sense to calculate the checksum if in both
cases
On 23.12.24 22:06, Mario Marietto wrote:
-> Did you re-read the data and compare checksums ?
Don't know how to do this.
Files can be considered binary identical if they do have the same checksums.
e.g.
# md5sum [files]
Using windows:
https://windowsreport.com/checksum-on-windows/
c:certu
There are times when a large file is copied up to 99% and then deleted
after having received the error. Other times when the error occurs earlier
and only a part of it is copied. Does it make sense to calculate the
checksum if in both cases in output I don't have the same information that
there is
