[Bug 14390] Feature request: don't fail if using "-z" transferring to rsync complied with --with-included-zlib=no

2020-05-24 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14390 --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison --- I've updated the compression code to add a negotiation idiom like I did for checksums, and then I re-enabled the external zlib's ability to handle both the old-style compression (now named "zlib") and the newer

[PATCH] file_checksum() optimization

2020-05-24 Thread Jorrit Jongma via rsync
When a whole-file checksum is performed, hashing was done in 64 byte blocks, causing overhead and limiting performance. Testing showed the performance improvement to go up quickly going from 64 to 512 bytes, with diminishing returns above, 4096 was where it seemed to plateau for me. Re-used CHUNK_

[Bug 14390] Feature request: don't fail if using "-z" transferring to rsync complied with --with-included-zlib=no

2020-05-24 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14390 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

Rsync with three folders

2020-05-24 Thread @lbutlr via rsync
OK I have the following setup: Server A: a remote server which runs rsync to a local machine to get new files Local: A local machine Local A: A folder on the local machine with new files for Server A yto get Local B: An empty folder on an external drive connected to Local Now, normally Local B