Hello,
There's a certain use case where rsync cannot act as bandwidth-
efficient as possible. Therefore I was wondering whether rsync could
be extended (albeit not trivially) to a more content-addressable way
of operation, or whether there's an application around that could
serve me better.
Situa
Adam Nielsen wrote...
> I'm wondering whether it is feasible to have an option that will make
> rsync spawn a separate thread to close files it has created, to avoid
> the main process blocking while the destination files are flushed during
> the close operation?
While your scenario resembles a p
