Re: --partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread Kevin Korb
Again, --partial only means don't delete the incomplete file if rsync is aborted. Normally rsync will delete the incomplete file so you don't have bogus files laying around. When you rsync to or from a network mount to rsync that is a local copy. To use rsync over the network either your source

RE: --partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread McDowell, Blake
Hi Kevin, I'm not a systems manager so my apologies if I'm a little lost here. I'm an audiovisual conservator/archivist and I use rsync for transferring files, a lot. Yes, I connect to the server and then it shows up as a disk on my desktop and I run rsync between the external drive mounted

Re: --partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread Kevin Korb
If you are doing a local only copy (rsync isn't networking) then --whole-file is forced. There is no benefit of reading and checksumming files to reduce network transfer when there is no network transfer. You said you were moving data to a remote server so I assume you are using a network mount o

RE: --partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread McDowell, Blake
Hi Kevin, I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears. So, if I am running partial (-P) and not using --whole-file o

Re: --partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread Kevin Korb
Partial means don't delete the incomplete file. The file is being transferred because it doesn't match. But rsync does delta-transfers so it won't actually transfer the parts that match. It will just verify that they do match. Unless of course --whole-file. On 06/24/2016 11:47 AM, McDowell, Bl

--partial not working?

2016-06-24 Thread McDowell, Blake
Hello, I’m running rsync -avPhi to move large video files to a remote server. Often we have to stop a transfer midway through to push something else to the server. My hope was that the -P flag would invoke --partial and the transfer would pick-up where it left off. This does not seem to be hap

Re: Operation not supported (95)

2016-06-24 Thread Albert Berger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:23:01AM +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > > >> In addition to what Kevin said, if you are rsync-ing to a SAMBA share, you > >> will be limited to what the SAMBA server supports and not all are > >> configured to enable ACL support. > > > >The 'backup' Samba share on the de

Re: Operation not supported (95)

2016-06-24 Thread Fabian Cenedese
>> In addition to what Kevin said, if you are rsync-ing to a SAMBA share, you >> will be limited to what the SAMBA server supports and not all are >> configured to enable ACL support. > >The 'backup' Samba share on the destination machine is configured with > >inherit acls = yes >inherit permissio

Re: Operation not supported (95)

2016-06-24 Thread Albert Berger
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:09:43PM -0700, Steven Levine wrote: > In <20160623205843.GB6633@kw.merryville>, on 06/23/16 >at 11:58 PM, Albert Berger said: > > Hi, > > >I did some search about this error before asking this question, and in > >other case unsupported ACLs were indeed the cause. B