[Bug 8367] Add a feature to --move-existing files

2016-05-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #4 from Devin Nate --- Comment on attachment 12104 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12104 rsync-3.1.2-rename-existingV6.patch Please find attached an updated version of this patch. It has been reworked for additional s

[Bug 8367] Add a feature to --move-existing files

2016-05-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #5 from Devin Nate --- Comment on attachment 12104 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12104 rsync-3.1.2-rename-existingV6.patch Please find attached an updated version of this patch. It has been reworked for additional s

[Bug 8367] Add a feature to --move-existing files

2016-05-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 Devin Nate changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6931|0 |1 is obsolete|

Re: --inplace option seems sending whole file

2016-05-15 Thread Kevin Korb
You don't have any options there that would tell you if it was transferring the whole file or not. --itemize-changes and --stats would help. On 05/15/2016 09:04 AM, rs...@contenidosonline.xyz wrote: > > Hi > > I'm having issues sendig a lot of tar.gz backup files to a ZFS remote > filesystem se

--inplace option seems sending whole file

2016-05-15 Thread rs...@contenidosonline.xyz
Hi I'm having issues sendig a lot of tar.gz backup files to a ZFS remote filesystem server. This files are compressed with the --rsyncable option. Sending without --inplace option rsync works well and send only the differences, but to create a temporary file and rewrite the file destination