https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11692
Bug ID: 11692
Summary: Update config.guess and config.sub
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 3/bar
1321176 -rw-r--r-- 6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 3/foo
1321176 -rw-r--r-- 6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 4/bar
1321176 -rw-r--r-- 6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 4/foo
23:00:38 ~/T$ ~/rsync-HEAD-20160124-
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:48 PM, <
dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com> wrote:
> That doesn't make sense. Both the source and destination path contains
> simple alphanumeric characters, no more no less. Why would it matter
> whether the path is /abc/ or /def/ or even /123/?
Hmm.. I thou
[Included text copied from the commit.]
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:52:49 +
> From: samba-b...@samba.org
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
> Wayne Davison changed:
>What|Removed |
On 2016-01-24 20:39, Selva Nair wrote:
Sorry for butting in, but hope this helps:
The command line you posted earlier reads
% rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f %b"
/source/ /destination/
I think Kevin is asking you write out that /source/ and /destination
exactly a
2016-01-24 18:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
...
>> You might be right but I am a bit hesitant.
>>
>>
>> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/58338/when-porting-code-must-i-follow-the-original-license
>>
>> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/90232/original-author-rights-in-a-lice
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:29 PM, <
dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote:
>
>> Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere
>> else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your
>> actual command line
>
>
> >
> > > I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would
> > > not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to
> > > LGPL anyway.
> > >
> > > So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort
> > > trying. Time is probably better spent
On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote:
Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere
else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your
actual command line and an ls -li of the correct source and incorrect
target?
Are you trolling me? All the information
Hi Martin,
2016-01-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
> It seems like yajsync is a reimplementation of rsync's protocol by looking
> at the GPL'd C rsync source, but it doesn't actually include any code from
> rsync. Is that right?
Yes correct, it is a complete rewrite in Java. Most of it is
comple
Hi Andrey,
2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky :
...
> If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a
> big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very
> different in opposite to BSD or public domain.
Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit a
12 matches
Mail list logo
