Hi,
from my point of view:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:09 +0100
Per Lundqvist wrote:
> ...
> > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to
> > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of
> > contributors.
> >
> > I experienced that finding a respo
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:59:49 -0800
Mike McCracken wrote:
> Hi, I filed bug 11521 [1] back in August, and I can't tell if anyone's
> looked at it.
>
> It is a pretty rare, but easy to understand problem, with (I think) a
> straightforward fix.
>
> I included a reproducer script and a patch that
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Gursky ---
(In reply to Michael McCracken from comment #1)
I believe the rsync maintainer might have commented this with at least the
reference to the mailing list [1], where this has been already proposed, though
ignore
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:04:20 -0800
Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> The problem is that if you transfer from a filesystem that has
> nanoseconds to one that does not support it, rsync would consider
> most of the files to be constantly different, since the nanosecond
> values would only match if the sour
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11683
tom916 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
