2015-10-13 19:40 GMT-04:00 Richard Couture :
> Note that my original post had -rave as the r is for recursive.
>
recursive is implied by -a. In other words, -rave is the same as -ave
>
> I have it working with cmd files, but the point is that I purchased the
> GUI to avert the need to send wind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is probably easier to just switch to unison since it has a native
GUI Windows version.
On 10/13/2015 05:14 PM, Richard Couture wrote:
> I purchased the cwRsync for windows to help a client backup her USB
> key after using it.
>
> I want the cwRsyn
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Xen wrote:
>
> As I said before, just rsyncing the lower layer (encrypted) of an eCryptfs
>> volume may work well -- no multiple decryption-encryption cycles and what
>> not.. Say you have an eCryptfs folder named ~/Private, then just keep your
>> images in ~/Priv
I purchased the cwRsync for windows to help a client backup her USB key
after using it.
I want the cwRsync_GUI_CLIENT to execute the equivalent of this command:
rsync -rave "ssh -p 922" /cygdrive/e u...@machine.domain.com:USBKey
Can anyone tell me how to do so??
Like most windows users, my cl
Selva Nair schreef:
If the backup is from an encrypted volume to another, depending on the
scheme used, you could arrange rsync to see only decrypted data (with the
transport protected by, say, ssh): for example, both destination and source
using eCryptfs could have the decrypted volumes mounte
Paolo Bolzoni schreef:
Why are you encrypting the files and not the filesystem and the channel?
Because of what the other person mentioned.
If anything anywhen gets compromised, people may have access to the
filesystem(s) and the channel(s) before they get access to the file.
That is to
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was wondering if I could ask this question here.
>
> Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block
> encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I
> found out later that most scheme
Why are you encrypting the files and not the filesystem and the channel?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Xen wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was wondering if I could ask this question here.
>
> Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block
> encryption to stay consistent from on
Hi Folks,
I was wondering if I could ask this question here.
Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block
encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I
found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a
random block or s
