I have just made rsync 3.1.1pre2 available for testing. This is a bug-fix
release that should hopefully handle the biggest issues that cropped up so
far in the testing of 3.1.0.
Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with
any questions, comments, or bug reports. If
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
--- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison 2014-05-26 21:57:53 UTC ---
If you were expecting the destination symlink to be followed, that is not how
rsync works. The -L option just affects source symlinks, and the -K option
just affects destination symlink
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
--- Comment #2 from David Levy 2014-05-26 21:35:15 UTC
---
Running
rsync -L
Should convert each link in directory to it's referent file, when the filename
exceeds 32 chars that fails. This is easy to test, don't just resolve cause
that fails.
Le
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison
On 26/05/14 15:10, Kevin Korb wrote:
> It is expecting something command line compatible with [rs]sh which I
> am pretty sure openssl is not.
>
I should have been more verbose. I'm not just randomly trying things. I
have successfully used this under Unix (via "--rsh"), but the same thing
doesn't w
