On Mar 12, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I doubt it. Only the first of the three numbers is even accurate
> (unless you disable incremental indexing or rsync is almost done).
Yes I use the file list (non incremental) and then the tot
Kevin:
(your reply did finally show up)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> >OK, in that case you should try using --ignore-times instead
>- --checksum. With --ignore-times rsync will redo the delta transfer of
>all files. This is usually faster than --checksum and won't caus
Hi
On Friday 07 March 2014 21:21:23 devz...@web.de wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> could you try if --inplace --no-whole-file makes a difference?
sadly, this make no difference.
I am using rsync over network when testing, so that is the expected result.
However, when I enable compression for the volume, t
Kevin:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
>- --checksum should not be used during normal rsync operations. It is
>for special cases only.
I noted in a reply that we're in that "special case" arena. The use
case is one where operations are being replicated between systems and
th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I doubt it. Only the first of the three numbers is even accurate
(unless you disable incremental indexing or rsync is almost done).
On 03/12/2014 08:04 AM, Robert DuToit wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Kevin Korb
> wrote:
>
> -v would be
On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -v would be %n%L
> You probably don't want --progress in a log file.
It works great. The one thing that it doesn’t seem to offer is any file count
for those uploaded as in progress. If poss
