br...@aljex.com schrieb:
Not that I have any say but I agree on both counts.
That is, I think it's ok for the 4.2.0 source not to be provided by them now,
if they are not supplying the 4.2.0 binaries now, but at least at the time they
were providing 4.2.0 binaries under gpl, then at that time
Not that I have any say but I agree on both counts.
That is, I think it's ok for the 4.2.0 source not to be provided by them now,
if they are not supplying the 4.2.0 binaries now, but at least at the time they
were providing 4.2.0 binaries under gpl, then at that time at least they were
obligat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-03-07 05:17 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 3:05 PM, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
>>
>> What I have:
>>
>> c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5 *cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip
>>
>> I will make it available for download if it's still missi
