Re: Low performance

2012-01-09 Thread Ing. Rainer Pietsch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 2012-01-09 12:03, schrieb Voelker, Bernhard: Tomasz wrote: I had network data transfer issue some time ago where transfers in one (A to B) direction were at full network speed.. Transfers in opposite directions (B to A) where going at 1 to 2 Kb

Re: disable interpretation of trailing slash

2012-01-09 Thread John J Foerch
"Voelker, Bernhard" writes: > John J Foerch wrote: > >> So I may take up your suggestion for my own use, but I did want to put >> forward the idea that since in my experience, trailing slash >> interpretation is an often-mentioned stumbling-block for rsync users, >> maybe it would be appropriate f

Re: Low performance

2012-01-09 Thread R. Pietsch
Am 2012-01-09 11:37, schrieb t...@vandradlabs.com.au: > I had network data transfer issue some time ago where transfers in one (A > to B) direction were at full network speed.. Transfers in opposite > directions (B to A) where going at 1 to 2 Kbit/sec. > > Eventually the cause was tracked down an

RE: Low performance

2012-01-09 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
Tomasz wrote: > I had network data transfer issue some time ago where transfers in one (A > to B) direction were at full network speed.. Transfers in opposite > directions (B to A) where going at 1 to 2 Kbit/sec. > > Eventually the cause was tracked down and it turned out to be a duplex > misma

Re: Low performance

2012-01-09 Thread tmc
I had network data transfer issue some time ago where transfers in one (A to B) direction were at full network speed.. Transfers in opposite directions (B to A) where going at 1 to 2 Kbit/sec. Eventually the cause was tracked down and it turned out to be a duplex mismatch caused by auto-negotiat

Re: Low performance

2012-01-09 Thread Hendrik Visage
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM, R. Pietsch wrote: > I try to capture such a rsync-stream with wireshark. Hmmm... receiving or transmitting side? I *assume* the transmitting side given the time difference between the packets and their ACKs. > the times are for example: > 10.510155 for the rsync-

RE: disable interpretation of trailing slash

2012-01-09 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
John J Foerch wrote: > So I may take up your suggestion for my own use, but I did want to put > forward the idea that since in my experience, trailing slash > interpretation is an often-mentioned stumbling-block for rsync users, > maybe it would be appropriate for rsync itself to provide a conveni