On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 15:51 +1100, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> I just noticed this commit for 3.1:
>
> ---
> commit cbdff74b44b25ce713739b9c1fb4db67610c675e
> Author: Wayne Davison
> Date: Mon Nov 21 09:13:11 2011 -0800
>
> Fix --compress data-duplication bug.
> ---
>
> Is there some reference
Hi,
I just noticed this commit for 3.1:
---
commit cbdff74b44b25ce713739b9c1fb4db67610c675e
Author: Wayne Davison
Date: Mon Nov 21 09:13:11 2011 -0800
Fix --compress data-duplication bug.
---
Is there some reference as to what that is actually fixing, e.g. bug number?
Specifically, I'm
In the bufferbloat age, anything that can make for a kinder,
gentler bulk transfer protocol seems desirable.
This add support for user and server selectable congestion control
algorithms. As examples:
--congestion-alg=lp # For the tcp-lp algorithm on the command line
Or in a subsection:
[mystu
Václav Ovsík (Mo 28 Nov 2011 10:05:58 CET):
> Hi,
> I rebased rw-devices patch for rsync last weekend. Seems to me it works
…
> I think a group of users want to use rsync to copy disk images.
For those (@Linux) who can't wait: I wrote a small script mapping a
block device via FUSE into something
Hi,
I rebased rw-devices patch for rsync last weekend. Seems to me it works
"incrementally". Attached are
* six git commits, or
* one complete patch
on top of current development rsync branch (master branch commit
60ef39705797c9df7069297eb4ed5feab5e88f29).
bobek:/data/soft/rsync/rsync# dd
