But in copying real files, there's alot more going on that file I/O...
and that's where rysnc spends most of its time.
If file-I/O dominates, and not much data to xfer, rsync is a win, but if
data to
xfer is 'full' .. rsync will always be notably slower.
(as you note below...though it's worse
If I run rsync w/no args I get a help (3.0.7).
It has: (among other things):
-h, --human-readableoutput numbers in a human-readable format
&
(-h) --help show this help (-h works with no other options)
So ... is it the case that -h with no other options gives help but
Rsync version 3.0.9pre2 is now available for release testing. This is
a bug-fix release.
Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list
with any questions, comments, or bug reports.
To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.8, visit this link:
http://rsync.samba.or
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8342
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison 2011-09-10 21:17:47 UTC ---
I have included the patch to have rsync temporarily tweak dirs with u+r and u+x
for a non-root receiver, however if a parent dir lacks u+x, any fudged
permissions inside subdirs of that d
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8445
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|rsync crash whe
