Re: Question about in-place option.

2011-06-22 Thread Mickaël CANÉVET
Hi, Thank you very much, it's working with --inplace --no-whole-file. Now snapshots of a 15GB database backup only takes a few kilobytes a day instead of 15GB. Mickaël On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:02 +0100, jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote: > Mickaël CANÉVET wrote: > > > I was wondering if there is a

Re: Question about in-place option.

2011-06-22 Thread jeremy
Mickaël CANÉVET wrote: > I was wondering if there is a way top specify rsync to replace only > different block in case of in-place update. > > When I rsync a huge binary file that change often to a Copy-On-Write > filesystem for backing it up (ZFS in my case, but I suppose that btrfs > will act t

Rsync 3.0.9pre1 released

2011-06-22 Thread Wayne Davison
Rsync version 3.0.9pre1 is now available for release testing. This is a bug-fix release. Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, or bug reports. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.8, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.or

[Bug 8252] files difference

2011-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8252 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Question about in-place option.

2011-06-22 Thread Mickaël CANÉVET
Hello, I was wondering if there is a way top specify rsync to replace only different block in case of in-place update. When I rsync a huge binary file that change often to a Copy-On-Write filesystem for backing it up (ZFS in my case, but I suppose that btrfs will act the same way) ; rsync replace

[Bug 8252] New: files difference

2011-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8252 Summary: files difference Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core