https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
Matt McCutchen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|file from link-dest-source |With -H --i-r, --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #8 from Matt McCutchen 2011-04-01 21:01:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 6364
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6364
Test script
(In reply to comment #7)
> Alphabetical order matters. If A has already been copied and B i
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 15:11 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I have released rsync 3.0.8.
The tag is missing from the source repository.
--
Matt
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #7 from ED Fochler 2011-04-01 18:54:05 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
I apologize for talking to myself on-list, but I've become enlightened about my
problem.
Alphabetical order matters. If A has already been copied and B is a new
h
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
ED Fochler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sa...@liquidbinary.com
--- Comment #6 from ED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8053
Summary: Older C compilers don't allow in-line declarations
flist.c:1653
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #5 from ED Fochler 2011-04-01 17:28:19 UTC
---
--protocol=29 solves this behavior for me. It seems the short circuit behavior
of rsync v3 doesn't check/remember inodes of files in the transfer request but
not currently being transferre
