[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Kevin Korb changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.0.8 |3.0.7 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Korb 2011-03-

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|3.0.7

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6304|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Korb 2011-03-18 12:49:22 UTC --- The patch does solve my problem. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA c

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Curu Wong changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6303|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #2 from Curu Wong 2011-03-18 09:22:58 UTC --- Comment on attachment 6303 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6303 rsync ACL numeric-ids option patch diff -ru rsync-3.0.7.orig/acls.c rsync-3.0.7/acls.c --- rsync-3.0.7.orig

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #1 from Curu Wong 2011-03-18 09:14:54 UTC --- Created attachment 6303 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6303 rsync ACL numeric-ids option patch It seems that rsync always maps user/group name to ids. we can see that in

Re: Unintuitive backwards-incompatible behaviour with rsync -a --link-dest --size-only

2011-03-18 Thread Wayne Davison
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:30, Bryan Hoyt | Brush Technology < br...@brush.co.nz> wrote: > Is this because --size-only doesn't affect the behaviour of --link-dest, > but only the transfer comparison? > Exactly. It is just telling rsync to tweak its "quick check" algorithm for files that don'