On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, hce wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:35 PM, wrote:
>> How many of the files are changing?
>
> Not many.
>
>> If the file size and times haven't change then rsync won't be comparing
>> things and calculating checksums. When rsync sees that a file has changed
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:35 PM, wrote:
> How many of the files are changing?
Not many.
> If the file size and times haven't change then rsync won't be comparing
> things and calculating checksums. When rsync sees that a file has changed
> then it compares checksums of the chunks to reduce
>> Are you specifying this lines in an excludes file?
>>
> yes
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Greetings,
We are upgrading systems in our lab from rhel4 to rhel5. We've
noticed a number of differences in behavior while using the same
arguments on the same data set. We get different sent and received
counts. We also had one case with some data corruption that was only
fixed after telling
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> rsync with --link-dest so that all files that aren't changed are
> hardlinked.
>
> Then to 'tar' all changed or new files you want a list of files without
> hardlinks as those are the files that where changed or new(*):
> find -type f -links 1
On 21.07.2010 10:22, Kevin Murray wrote:
> Hi Henri
>
> Thanks very much. LBackup looks good, but i need a solution which only
> copies files which have changed, and does not link the others, as the
> folder is destined for a tar archive. Also, the copied files must be
> fully functional, i.e. mus
