DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2094] Keep the last-sync time for better two-way synchronization

2010-07-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2094 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@rodovid.org --- Commen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7565] --check-point= +options.c.patch +generator.c.patch

2010-07-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7565 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7454] assertion failed in finish_hard_link()

2010-07-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7454 --- Comment #3 from b...@debian.org 2010-07-12 07:30 CST --- Sorry for my long silence on this bug. It's rather tricky to track down, as I can only trigger it with a large tree (approx 1M files) and lots and lots of hardlinks. I can sti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7565] --check-point= +options.c.patch +generator.c.patch

2010-07-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7565 --- Comment #5 from b...@rodovid.org 2010-07-12 07:15 CST --- (In reply to comment #4) > What use do you have in mind for this option? > this is a first step to a full bidirectional synchronization. So far as I know, a good feature for