Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Mike, Sorry about that - it seems to be working perfectly now. I hadn't realized it was built on 3.0.7 (I tried on 3.0.6). Even better! Thanks, Rob On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: > Well, it looks like the hfs_compression patch that I posted was the problem, > and I've solv

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Mike, on the first build try I got a make error: patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Thanks Mike once again, I'll test this out tomorrow. Rob On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: Well, it looks like the hfs_compression patch that I posted was the problem, and I've solved it since then. I can reproduce the issue with the patch, but not with my subsequent change

link-dest question revisted

2010-07-01 Thread doug
I asked a question about not link-dest not creating hardlinks and got ideas and hints that led to the solution which is the link-dest dir must/should be relative to the destination and/or the destination must be empty. I did both and that works fine. My question is what would cause rsync to co

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Mike and All, I have been doing some research on the damaged HFS compressed files and found some interesting clues. Looking at mike's patch so far I can't find any reason for the damage (I have to learn more C language ) but what still seems odd is that the damage only happens when copying t