7 maj 2010 kl. 21.20 skrev Kyle Lanclos:
It would likely increase the latency, but it should not significantly
impact the required bandwidth, assuming that you have a full-duplex
connection. If you have a half-duplex connection, yes, the bandwidth
consumption would double.
I stand corrected an
Hello everyone, running rsync version 3.0.7 if i call a shell script with
the content:
*rsync -a -e 'ssh -i /home/mapsync/.ssh/id_rsa' --bwlimit=1221
--files-from=/tmp/tf2maplist --no-relative / maps...@foo.com:
/home/mapsync/tf2maps*
Everything runs great from a shell and /tmp/tf2maplist is a fil
Christian Huldt wrote:
> That I have no idea about, but I believe it would double the bandwith
> requirements or half the speed compared to
>
> ssh r...@client "rsync /var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/"
It would likely increase the latency, but it should not significantly
impact the required b
7 maj 2010 kl. 17.43 skrev Michael Renner:
Moin,
this is something for the wish list: a 'rsync in the middle' mode. It
would make sense: rsync is running at a server. Copyying files from
one
maschine to a file server.
rsync r...@client:/var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/
Would this be poss
Moin,
this is something for the wish list: a 'rsync in the middle' mode. It
would make sense: rsync is running at a server. Copyying files from one
maschine to a file server.
rsync r...@client:/var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/
Would this be possible without breaking the hard link mechanism?
CU
