Oh, sorry, I didn't get that the filesystem to check was the remote one. Now I
get why the solution is so complex.
Le 18 mars 2010 à 18:30, Paul Slootman a écrit :
> On Thu 18 Mar 2010, Mac User FR wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions from sh with a
>> smaller footpr
On Thu 18 Mar 2010, Mac User FR wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions from sh with a
> smaller footprint than rsync --list to check if the directory
> exists?
> I think on something like:
> -d file
> True if file exists and is a directory.
That won't work to ch
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Mac User FR wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions from sh with a smaller
> footprint than rsync --list to check if the directory exists?
> I think on something like:
>
> -d file
> True if file exists and is a directory.
>
> (sou
Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions from sh with a
smaller footprint than rsync --list to check if the directory exists?
I think on something like:
-d file
True if file exists and is a directory.
(source: man sh)
Cheers,
Vitorio
Le 18 mars 10 à 17:30, Linux Expert
Yes, it'll sync the source directory (now empty) to Server B, deleting
everything due to the --delete option.
One solution I use is to place a check for the existence of a subdirectory
just before the rsync command in the script. This was you can make rsync
contingent on the existence of that sub
I was just pondering:
Lets look at Server A with one extra harddisc hdb, where hdb1 is mounted at
/mnt/folder.
/mnt/folder is the folder which should be mirrored on Server B.
So Server B rsyncs
rsynch -a -delete server::folder /folder
from Server A and gets all the new files and delete
