Re: Rsync - timeout or similar

2010-03-06 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Eduardo Terzella (eterze...@gmail.com) wrote on 6 March 2010 21:05: >Is there any parameter in the rsync binary that I can finish the time the >binary should wait to start a file transfer, otherwise close the rsync >binary. As I read the timeout is a parameter used when the connection has >alre

Rsync - timeout or similar

2010-03-06 Thread Eduardo Terzella
Is there any parameter in the rsync binary that I can finish the time the binary should wait to start a file transfer, otherwise close the rsync binary. As I read the timeout is a parameter used when the connection has already been established, and when it is not, which parameter I can use? -- Ple

Re: Excluding/Hiding a local, absolute path in 3.0.7

2010-03-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
[Going through old email. I wanted to confirm whether there was an rsync bug here.] On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 18:16 -0500, Ryan Flannery wrote: > The command I'm using is this: >rsync -avz --delete --delete-excluded --exclude-from=foo.txt /etc/ > $dest:path > > Where foo.txt contains either: >

Re: rsync 3.0.7 - error deleting directory

2010-03-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
[Going through old email.] On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:24 +0100, Philipp Herz - allied internet ag wrote: > based on a nightly cronjob we use "rsync --delete" to delete partitial > directory structure from a backup folder. Sometimes rsync is unable to > delete structure as told. > > rsync: unlink

Re: Problems transferring from older version of rsync to new

2010-03-06 Thread Javier Henderson
* Wayne Davison [100306 12:06]: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Javier Henderson wrote: > > > (Client) Protocol versions: remote=29, negotiated=29 > > Invalid flist flag: 1004 > > > > I looked at both 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 last week and didn't see any way for the > old code to construct a 0x1004

Re: rsync daemon performance

2010-03-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote: > Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache > runs? No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think it would be simple to add, but if someone wants to work on patch, I'd consider adding it

Re: why more than one temp file for a single rsync download?

2010-03-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Felipe Alvarez wrote: > A large file (2+ GB) needs to be transfered, but I see more than one > temp file for it. If you're using 2.6.8, upgrade to a newer version -- it has a bug where an interrupted transfer could leave a temp file lying around. ..wayne.. -- P

Re: cygwin + rsync issue under Windows 7 x64

2010-03-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: > > The latest rsync (3.0.7-1) under an up-to-date cygwin on Windows 7 x64 gets into some kind of busy wait situation when transferring large files over ssh. rsync, ssh, and zip can all be consuming much cpu time. [...] I downloaded and built

Re: Problems transferring from older version of rsync to new

2010-03-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Javier Henderson wrote: > (Client) Protocol versions: remote=29, negotiated=29 > Invalid flist flag: 1004 > I looked at both 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 last week and didn't see any way for the old code to construct a 0x1004 value for the file list flags, but sadly I neglec